• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童癫痫持续状态后死亡和神经后遗症的危险因素。

Risk factors for fatality and neurological sequelae after status epilepticus in children.

作者信息

Maegaki Y, Kurozawa Y, Hanaki K, Ohno K

机构信息

Division of Child Neurology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.

出版信息

Neuropediatrics. 2005 Jun;36(3):186-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865611.

DOI:10.1055/s-2005-865611
PMID:15944904
Abstract

Using multivariate regression analysis, we examined risk factors for fatality and neurological sequelae after status epilepticus (SE) in children. Possible risk factors included sex, age at onset, the cause of SE, pyrexia, asthmatic attack during SE, past history of seizure, predisposing neurological abnormality, seizure duration, type of seizure, and medication with theophylline. Consecutive patients with SE, aged 1 month to 18 years, who were referred to Tottori University Hospital from 1984 to 2002 were reviewed. Of the 234 patients enrolled, 45 patients (19.2 %) showed poor outcomes, namely early death in 9 and neurological sequela in 36. Acute neurological insult and progressive neurological disease as the cause of SE were very significantly related to poor outcome (OR = 33.68, p = 0.000). We excluded 21 patients with the etiology of acute neurological insult and progressive neurological disease and then reanalyzed risk factors in the remaining 213 patients. Twenty-nine patients (13.6 %) showed poor outcome, namely early death in 6 and neurological sequela in 23. Seizure duration of more than 2 hours (OR = 12.73, p = 0.000) and moderate to severe asthmatic attack (OR = 31.61, p = 0.010) were associated with poor outcome. These results indicate that long-lasting seizure activity and asthmatic attack can exacerbate SE-associated brain injury.

摘要

我们采用多变量回归分析,研究了儿童癫痫持续状态(SE)后死亡及神经后遗症的危险因素。可能的危险因素包括性别、发病年龄、SE的病因、发热、SE期间的哮喘发作、既往癫痫病史、易患神经异常、癫痫持续时间、癫痫类型以及使用茶碱治疗。回顾了1984年至2002年转诊至鸟取大学医院的1个月至18岁的连续性SE患者。在纳入的234例患者中,45例(19.2%)预后不良,其中9例早期死亡,36例有神经后遗症。作为SE病因的急性神经损伤和进行性神经疾病与不良预后密切相关(OR = 33.68,p = 0.000)。我们排除了21例急性神经损伤和进行性神经疾病病因的患者,然后对其余213例患者重新分析危险因素。29例(13.6%)预后不良,其中6例早期死亡,23例有神经后遗症。癫痫持续时间超过2小时(OR = 12.73,p = 0.000)和中度至重度哮喘发作(OR = 31.61,p = 0.010)与不良预后相关。这些结果表明,长时间的癫痫活动和哮喘发作会加重与SE相关的脑损伤。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for fatality and neurological sequelae after status epilepticus in children.儿童癫痫持续状态后死亡和神经后遗症的危险因素。
Neuropediatrics. 2005 Jun;36(3):186-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865611.
2
Convulsive status epilepticus in Thai children at Ramathibodi Hospital.拉玛蒂博迪医院泰国儿童的惊厥性癫痫持续状态
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Jun;89(6):803-8.
3
Aborted and refractory status epilepticus in children: a comparative analysis.儿童癫痫持续状态的中止与难治:一项对比分析。
Epilepsia. 2008 Apr;49(4):615-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01465.x. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
4
Status epilepticus: clinical presentation, cause, outcome, and predictors of death in 119 Ethiopian patients.癫痫持续状态:119例埃塞俄比亚患者的临床表现、病因、转归及死亡预测因素
Epilepsia. 2008 Apr;49(4):600-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01556.x. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
5
Status epilepticus after stroke is associated with increased long-term case fatality.中风后癫痫持续状态与长期病死率增加相关。
Epilepsia. 2006 Dec;47(12):2020-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00845.x.
6
Initial EEG in status epilepticus is helpful in predicting seizure recurrence.癫痫持续状态时的首次脑电图有助于预测癫痫复发。
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 May-Jun;46(3):139-44.
7
Status epilepticus: aetiology and outcome in children.癫痫持续状态:儿童的病因及预后
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008 Jul-Sep;20(3):51-3.
8
Febrile status epilepticus.热性惊厥持续状态
Pediatrics. 1990 Oct;86(4):611-6.
9
Etiologies and outcomes of status epilepticus in children.儿童癫痫持续状态的病因及预后
Epilepsy Behav. 2005 Nov;7(3):502-5. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.07.005. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
10
Low morbidity and mortality of status epilepticus in children.儿童癫痫持续状态的发病率和死亡率较低。
Pediatrics. 1989 Mar;83(3):323-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with long-term outcomes in pediatric refractory status epilepticus.与儿童难治性癫痫持续状态长期结局相关的因素。
Epilepsia. 2021 Sep;62(9):2190-2204. doi: 10.1111/epi.16984. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
2
Clinical presentation of new onset refractory status epilepticus in children (the pSERG cohort).儿童新发难治性癫痫持续状态的临床特征(pSERG 队列研究)。
Epilepsia. 2021 Jul;62(7):1629-1642. doi: 10.1111/epi.16950. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
3
First-line medication dosing in pediatric refractory status epilepticus.儿童难治性癫痫持续状态的一线药物治疗。
Neurology. 2020 Nov 10;95(19):e2683-e2696. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010828. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
4
Markers in Status Epilepticus Prognosis.癫痫持续状态预后标志物。
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Sep;37(5):422-428. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000761.
5
Long-term outcomes of status epilepticus: A critical assessment.癫痫持续状态的长期转归:批判性评估。
Epilepsia. 2018 Oct;59 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):155-169. doi: 10.1111/epi.14515. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
6
Retrospective review of pediatric status epilepticus in 116 Saudi patients: predictors of outcome.116例沙特患儿癫痫持续状态的回顾性研究:预后预测因素
Ann Saudi Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;37(6):455-460. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2017.455.
7
Risk factors associated with death in in-hospital pediatric convulsive status epilepticus.与院内儿童惊厥性癫痫持续状态相关的死亡风险因素。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047474. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
8
Midazolam versus diazepam for the treatment of status epilepticus in children and young adults: a meta-analysis.咪达唑仑与地西泮治疗儿童和青年成人性癫痫持续状态的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;17(6):575-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00751.x.
9
Time-critical neurological emergencies: the unfulfilled role for point-of-care testing.时间紧迫的神经科急症:即时检验未发挥的作用
Int J Emerg Med. 2010 May 18;3(2):127-31. doi: 10.1007/s12245-010-0177-9.
10
A clinical, radiological and outcome study of status epilepticus from India.印度癫痫持续状态的临床、影像学和预后研究。
J Neurol. 2010 Feb;257(2):224-9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-5298-9.