Johnson A D, Meyer B J, Ptashne M
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5061-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5061.
The lambda phage repressor binds cooperatively to the three sites in the right operator (O(R)) according to the following pattern. If the DNA is wild type, O(R)1 and O(R)2 are filled coordinately because of interactions between repressor dimers bound to these two sites. Site O(R)3 is filled only at higher repressor concentrations. In contrast, if O(R)1 is mutant, O(R)2 and O(R)3 are filled coordinately because of interactions between repressors bound to these sites. In this case, the affinity of O(R)3 is increased and that of O(R)2 is decreased relative to the wild type. We infer that a repressor dimer bound to the middle site O(R)2 can interact either with another repressor dimer bound to O(R)1 (wild-type case) or, alternatively, with one bound to O(R)3 (mutant O(R)1 case). We argue that these repressor interactions are mediated by protein-protein contacts between adjacent repressor dimers, because the isolated amino-terminal domains of repressor bind to the operator sites noncooperatively. The cro protein of phage lambda, a second regulatory protein, which recognizes the same three sites in O(R) as does repressor, binds non-cooperatively. Experiments performed in vivo show that regulation of gene expression by repressor can be influenced critically by cooperative interactions. We demonstrate that the effect of repressor in a lysogen on the activity of the promoter P(RM) can be changed from activation to repression by deletion of O(R)1. We explain this effect in terms of the alternative cooperative interactions described above.
λ噬菌体阻遏蛋白按以下模式协同结合于右侧操纵子(O(R))中的三个位点。如果DNA是野生型,由于结合在这两个位点的阻遏蛋白二聚体之间的相互作用,O(R)1和O(R)2会协同被占据。只有在阻遏蛋白浓度较高时,O(R)3才会被占据。相反,如果O(R)1是突变型,由于结合在这些位点的阻遏蛋白之间的相互作用,O(R)2和O(R)3会协同被占据。在这种情况下,相对于野生型,O(R)3的亲和力增加而O(R)2的亲和力降低。我们推断,结合在中间位点O(R)2的阻遏蛋白二聚体既可以与结合在O(R)1的另一个阻遏蛋白二聚体相互作用(野生型情况),也可以与结合在O(R)3的阻遏蛋白二聚体相互作用(O(R)1突变型情况)。我们认为这些阻遏蛋白的相互作用是由相邻阻遏蛋白二聚体之间的蛋白质 - 蛋白质接触介导的,因为阻遏蛋白分离的氨基末端结构域非协同地结合到操纵子位点。噬菌体λ的Cro蛋白是另一种调节蛋白,它识别O(R)中与阻遏蛋白相同的三个位点,其结合是非协同的。体内实验表明,阻遏蛋白对基因表达的调控会受到协同相互作用的严重影响。我们证明,通过缺失O(R)1,溶原菌中阻遏蛋白对启动子P(RM)活性的影响可以从激活变为抑制。我们根据上述替代协同相互作用来解释这种效应。