Suppr超能文献

大脑中动脉夹层:颈内动脉孤立性夹层与扩展性夹层的差异

Middle cerebral artery dissections: differences between isolated and extended dissections of internal carotid artery.

作者信息

Lin Chin-Hsien, Jeng Jiann-Shing, Yip Ping-Keung

机构信息

Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, 100, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

J Neurol Sci. 2005 Aug 15;235(1-2):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.03.047.

Abstract

Isolated middle cerebral artery dissection (MCAD) has rarely been encountered clinically and few have reviewed it systemically. The etiologies, clinical manifestations, natural clinical course and prognosis of MCAD remain poorly understood. From 1995 to 2004, there were 5 cases diagnosed clinically and angiographically to have MCAD (isolated MCAD in 1, ICAD-MCAD in 4) from a medical center in Taiwan. MEDLINE (1966-2003) was searched for published articles in English that concerned the diagnosis of MCAD. Clinical presentations, stroke types, angiographic findings, etiologies, treatment strategies and outcomes were compared between cases with isolated MCAD or ICAD-MCAD. There were 23 cases (male, 46%; mean age, 22.9+/-19.5 years) with 24 events of isolated MCAD and 31 cases (male, 47%; mean age, 22.2+/-12.9 years) with 35 events of ICAD-MCAD. The types of stroke in isolated MCAD group included subarachnoid hemorrhage (12%) and cerebral infarction (88%); and in ICAD-MCAD group were subarachnoid hemorrhage (6%) and cerebral infarction (94%). The presenting symptoms were similar between both groups. Fluctuating course was more often in isolated MCAD than in ICAD-MCAD (17% vs. 3%, p=0.061). Recurrence of dissection events in both groups was infrequent (4% vs. 9%, p=0.56). Both groups had high case-fatality rates (MCAD, 48%; ICAD-MCAD, 58%). The cause of dissection in both groups was idiopathic in the majority. Congenital vessel wall defects were found in 26% of ICAD-MCAD, but in only 4% of isolated MCAD (p=0.066). In contrast, preceded trauma was more often found in isolated MCAD than ICAD-MCAD (35% vs. 19%, p=0.085). Arteritis was noted in 16% of ICAD-MCAD patients, but none in isolated MCAD. Angiography revealed segmental stenosis in 72% of isolated MCAD and 96% of ICAD-MCAD. Aneurysmal dilatation of the involved cerebral arteries was noted in 28% of isolated MCAD, but none in MCAD-ICAD. Both isolated MCAD and ICAD-MCAD can cause vascular events with high mortality rates. Several aspects differed between 2 groups, including clinical course, underlying etiologies and angiographic findings.

摘要

孤立性大脑中动脉夹层(MCAD)在临床上很少见,很少有系统性的综述。MCAD的病因、临床表现、自然病程和预后仍知之甚少。1995年至2004年,台湾一家医疗中心临床诊断并经血管造影确诊为MCAD的有5例(孤立性MCAD 1例,夹层相关的颅内动脉疾病合并MCAD 4例)。检索MEDLINE(1966 - 2003年)中关于MCAD诊断的英文发表文章。比较孤立性MCAD或夹层相关的颅内动脉疾病合并MCAD患者的临床表现、卒中类型、血管造影结果、病因、治疗策略和结局。有23例(男性占46%;平均年龄22.9±19.5岁)发生24次孤立性MCAD事件,31例(男性占47%;平均年龄22.2±12.9岁)发生35次夹层相关的颅内动脉疾病合并MCAD事件。孤立性MCAD组的卒中类型包括蛛网膜下腔出血(12%)和脑梗死(88%);夹层相关的颅内动脉疾病合并MCAD组为蛛网膜下腔出血(6%)和脑梗死(94%)。两组的首发症状相似。孤立性MCAD组病情波动较夹层相关的颅内动脉疾病合并MCAD组更常见(17%对3%,p = 0.061)。两组夹层事件复发均不常见(4%对9%,p = 0.56)。两组病死率均较高(MCAD为48%;夹层相关的颅内动脉疾病合并MCAD为58%)。两组夹层的病因多数为特发性。26%的夹层相关的颅内动脉疾病合并MCAD发现有先天性血管壁缺陷,而孤立性MCAD仅4%有(p = 0.066)。相反,孤立性MCAD比夹层相关的颅内动脉疾病合并MCAD更常发现有先前创伤史(35%对19%,p = 0.085)。16%的夹层相关的颅内动脉疾病合并MCAD患者有动脉炎,而孤立性MCAD无一例有。血管造影显示72%的孤立性MCAD和96%的夹层相关的颅内动脉疾病合并MCAD有节段性狭窄。28%的孤立性MCAD发现受累脑动脉有动脉瘤样扩张,而夹层相关的颅内动脉疾病合并MCAD无一例有。孤立性MCAD和夹层相关的颅内动脉疾病合并MCAD均可导致血管事件,病死率高。两组在几个方面存在差异,包括临床病程、潜在病因和血管造影结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验