• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉夹层的发病率及转归:一项基于人群的研究。

Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection: a population-based study.

作者信息

Lee Vivien H, Brown Robert D, Mandrekar Jayawant N, Mokri Bahram

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Neurology. 2006 Nov 28;67(10):1809-12. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000244486.30455.71.

DOI:10.1212/01.wnl.0000244486.30455.71
PMID:17130413
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incidence rates for internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD) have been reported to be 2.6 to 2.9 per 100,000, but reliable epidemiologic data for vertebral artery dissection (VAD) are not available.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence rate of cervical artery dissection (CAD) in a defined population.

METHODS

With IRB approval, we used the medical record linkage system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project to identify all patients diagnosed with spontaneous ICAD and VAD for the period of 1987-2003 in Olmsted County, MN.

RESULTS

Of 48 patients with CAD, there were 32 patients with ICAD and 18 patients with VAD. In Olmsted County, the average annual incidence rate for ICAD was 1.72 per 100,000 population (95% CI, 1.13 to 2.32) and for VAD 0.97 per 100,000 population (95% CI, 0.52 to 1.4). The average annual incidence rate for CAD was 2.6 per 100,000 population (95% CI, 1.86 to 3.33). The most frequently encountered symptoms in CAD were head or neck pain (80%), cerebral ischemia (TIA or infarct) (56%), and Horner syndrome (25%). Good outcome (defined as modified Rankin score of 0 to 2) was seen in 92% of patients. No recurrence of dissection was observed during a mean 7.8 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Internal carotid artery dissection was detected approximately twice as frequently as vertebral artery dissection in the overall study, but in the latter half of the study period, vertebral artery and internal carotid artery dissection incidence rates were equivalent. The majority of cervical artery dissection patients in the community have excellent outcome, and contrary to many tertiary referral series, re-dissection is rare.

摘要

背景

据报道,颈内动脉夹层(ICAD)的发病率为每10万人2.6至2.9例,但椎动脉夹层(VAD)的可靠流行病学数据尚无可用。

目的

确定特定人群中颈动脉夹层(CAD)的发病率。

方法

经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准,我们使用罗切斯特流行病学项目的病历链接系统,识别明尼苏达州奥尔姆斯特德县1987 - 2003年期间所有诊断为自发性ICAD和VAD的患者。

结果

48例CAD患者中,32例为ICAD,18例为VAD。在奥尔姆斯特德县,ICAD的年平均发病率为每10万人1.72例(95%可信区间,1.13至2.32),VAD为每10万人0.97例(95%可信区间,0.52至1.4)。CAD的年平均发病率为每10万人2.6例(95%可信区间,1.86至3.33)。CAD最常见的症状是头部或颈部疼痛(80%)、脑缺血(短暂性脑缺血发作或梗死)(56%)和霍纳综合征(25%)。92%的患者预后良好(定义为改良Rankin评分为0至2)。在平均7.8年的随访期间未观察到夹层复发。

结论

在整个研究中,颈内动脉夹层的检出频率约为椎动脉夹层的两倍,但在研究期后半段,椎动脉和颈内动脉夹层的发病率相当。社区中大多数颈动脉夹层患者预后良好,与许多三级转诊系列不同的是,再次夹层很少见。

相似文献

1
Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection: a population-based study.颈动脉夹层的发病率及转归:一项基于人群的研究。
Neurology. 2006 Nov 28;67(10):1809-12. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000244486.30455.71.
2
Differential features of carotid and vertebral artery dissections: the CADISP study.颈动脉和椎动脉夹层的不同特征:CADISP 研究。
Neurology. 2011 Sep 20;77(12):1174-81. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822f03fc. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
3
Polyarterial clustered recurrence of cervical artery dissection seems to be the rule.颈内动脉夹层的多动脉簇状复发似乎是规律。
Neurology. 2007 Jul 10;69(2):180-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000265595.50915.1e.
4
Cervical artery dissection: risk factors, treatment, and outcome; a 5-year experience from a tertiary care center.颈动脉夹层:危险因素、治疗和转归;一家三级医疗中心的 5 年经验。
Int J Neurosci. 2012 Jan;122(1):40-4. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2011.622453. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
5
Incidence and outcome of cerebrovascular events related to cervical artery dissection: the Dijon Stroke Registry.与颈动脉夹层相关的脑血管事件的发生率和结局:第戎卒中登记研究
Int J Stroke. 2014 Oct;9(7):879-82. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12154. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
6
Fibromuscular dysplasia may herald symptomatic recurrence of cervical artery dissection.纤维肌性发育异常可能预示着颈动脉夹层出现症状复发。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23(5-6):448-52. doi: 10.1159/000101470. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
7
Impairment of endothelial function in patients with spontaneous cervical artery dissection: evidence for a general arterial wall disease.自发性颈内动脉夹层患者的内皮功能损害:全身性动脉壁疾病的证据
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17(2-3):170-4. doi: 10.1159/000075787. Epub 2003 Dec 29.
8
Cervical artery dissection in young adults in the stroke in young Fabry patients (sifap1) study.年轻法布里病患者卒中研究(sifap1)中年轻成年人的颈动脉夹层。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;39(2):110-21. doi: 10.1159/000371338. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
9
Clinical import of Horner syndrome in internal carotid and vertebral artery dissection.颈动脉和椎动脉夹层中霍纳综合征的临床意义。
Neurology. 2014 May 6;82(18):1653-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000381. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
10
Middle cerebral artery dissections: differences between isolated and extended dissections of internal carotid artery.大脑中动脉夹层:颈内动脉孤立性夹层与扩展性夹层的差异
J Neurol Sci. 2005 Aug 15;235(1-2):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.03.047.

引用本文的文献

1
Observational Study of the Safety of Chiropractic vs Medical Care Among Older Adults With Neck Pain.针对颈部疼痛的老年人,整脊疗法与医疗护理安全性的观察性研究。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2025.07.002.
2
Carotid artery dissection recanalization: imaging modalities, influencing factors, and therapeutic perspectives.颈动脉夹层再通:影像学检查方法、影响因素及治疗前景
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 8;16:1624698. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1624698. eCollection 2025.
3
Reverse flow-enhanced catheterization of true lumen in carotid artery dissection: the REFLECT technique.
颈动脉夹层真腔逆向血流增强导管插入术:REFLECT技术
Neuroradiology. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03714-x.
4
Poor neurological outcome after treatment with photobiomodulation in a patient recovering from sequelae of vertebral artery dissection.一名从椎动脉夹层后遗症恢复的患者在接受光生物调节治疗后出现不良神经学转归。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s13760-025-02830-y.
5
Management of cervical artery dissection: new evidence and future directions.颈内动脉夹层的管理:新证据与未来方向。
J Neurol. 2025 May 27;272(6):426. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13166-1.
6
Spontaneous Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissection: A Rare Cause of Ischemic Stroke.自发性颅内椎动脉夹层:缺血性卒中的罕见病因。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 15;12(5):187. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12050187.
7
Intracranial vertebral artery dissection without hemorrhagic presentation.无出血表现的颅内椎动脉夹层
Neurol Sci. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-08234-3.
8
Combined chiropractic care and Tai Chi for chronic neck pain: A protocol for a pilot randomized trial.脊椎按摩疗法与太极拳联合治疗慢性颈部疼痛:一项试点随机试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Apr 11;45:101482. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101482. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Diagnostic Challenges in Atypical Presentations of Spontaneous Vertebral Artery Dissection.自发性椎动脉夹层非典型表现的诊断挑战
Cureus. 2025 Mar 28;17(3):e81372. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81372. eCollection 2025 Mar.
10
Incidence Trends and Risk of Recurrent Stroke of Cervical Artery Dissections in the United States Between 2005 and 2019.2005年至2019年美国颈动脉瘤样夹层的发病率趋势及复发性中风风险
Neurology. 2025 May 13;104(9):e213548. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213548. Epub 2025 Apr 2.