Stephenson Andrew J, Smith Alex, Kattan Michael W, Satagopan Jaya, Reuter Victor E, Scardino Peter T, Gerald William L
Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Cancer. 2005 Jul 15;104(2):290-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21157.
Gene expression profiling of prostate carcinoma offers an alternative means to distinguish aggressive tumor biology and may improve the accuracy of outcome prediction for patients with prostate carcinoma treated by radical prostatectomy.
Gene expression differences between 37 recurrent and 42 nonrecurrent primary prostate tumor specimens were analyzed by oligonucleotide microarrays. Two logistic regression modeling approaches were used to predict prostate carcinoma recurrence after radical prostatectomy. One approach was based exclusively on gene expression differences between the two classes. The second approach integrated prognostic gene variables with a validated postoperative predictive model based on standard variables (nomogram). The predictive accuracy of these modeling approaches was evaluated by leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and compared with the nomogram.
The modeling approach using gene variables alone accurately classified 59 (75%) tissue samples in LOOCV, a classification rate substantially higher than expected by chance. However, this predictive accuracy was inferior to the nomogram (concordance index, 0.75 vs. 0.84, P = 0.01). Models combining clinical and gene variables accurately classified 70 (89%) tissue samples and the predictive accuracy using this approach (concordance index, 0.89) was superior to the nomogram (P = 0.009) and models based on gene variables alone (P < 0.001). Importantly, the combined approach provided a marked improvement for patients whose nomogram-predicted likelihood of disease recurrence was in the indeterminate range (7-year disease progression-free probability, 30-70%; concordance index, 0.83 vs. 0.59, P = 0.01).
Integration of gene expression signatures and clinical variables produced predictive models for prostate carcinoma recurrence that perform significantly better than those based on either clinical variables or gene expression information alone.
前列腺癌的基因表达谱分析提供了一种区分侵袭性肿瘤生物学行为的替代方法,并且可能提高接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者预后预测的准确性。
通过寡核苷酸微阵列分析37例复发的和42例未复发的原发性前列腺肿瘤标本之间的基因表达差异。使用两种逻辑回归建模方法预测根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌的复发情况。一种方法完全基于两类样本之间的基因表达差异。第二种方法将预后基因变量与基于标准变量(列线图)的经过验证的术后预测模型相结合。通过留一法交叉验证(LOOCV)评估这些建模方法的预测准确性,并与列线图进行比较。
仅使用基因变量的建模方法在LOOCV中准确分类了59个(75%)组织样本,分类率显著高于随机预期。然而,这种预测准确性低于列线图(一致性指数,0.75对0.84,P = 0.01)。结合临床和基因变量的模型准确分类了70个(89%)组织样本,使用该方法的预测准确性(一致性指数,0.89)优于列线图(P = 0.009)和仅基于基因变量的模型(P < 0.001)。重要的是,对于列线图预测疾病复发可能性处于不确定范围的患者(7年无疾病进展概率,30 - 70%;一致性指数,0.83对0.59,P = 0.01),联合方法有显著改善。
基因表达特征与临床变量的整合产生了用于前列腺癌复发的预测模型,其表现明显优于仅基于临床变量或基因表达信息的模型。