Stockwell Alexis, Whiteford Harvey, Townsend Clare, Stewart Donald
Mental Health Unit, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research (QCMHR), Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Australas Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;13(2):190-4. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1665.2005.02187.x.
To identify key issues in the mental health policy development process in Cambodia that will contribute to an increased understanding of how mental health policy gets on the public policy agenda, how it stays there and why policy implementation fails or succeeds. The research was formative because mental health policy analysis is a young and newly emerging discipline.
A retrospective case study methodology was used to research the development of the draft Cambodian Mental Health Plan 2003-2022. Ten key informants involved in the policy development process were interviewed using a semistructured questionnaire designed to collect qualitative data about the policy formation process, stakeholders and context.
The research identified key issues influencing mental health policy development. These are the need to include the Ministry of Health (MoH) in the development of mental health plans; the significance of timing; the usefulness of mental health plans; the impact of the post-conflict context on policy development; and the evolution of stakeholder groups and their need to learn how to debate the merits of mental health reform.
The findings are formative given methodology limitations. However, important insight is provided into the dynamics of the policy development processes that occurred in Cambodia. This allows the generation of important hypotheses for future mental health policy process research in both Cambodia and other post-conflict developing countries.
确定柬埔寨心理健康政策制定过程中的关键问题,这将有助于加深对心理健康政策如何进入公共政策议程、如何在议程上保持以及政策实施为何失败或成功的理解。该研究具有形成性,因为心理健康政策分析是一门年轻且新兴的学科。
采用回顾性案例研究方法,对《2003 - 2022年柬埔寨心理健康计划》草案的制定过程进行研究。使用半结构化问卷对参与政策制定过程的10名关键信息提供者进行访谈,该问卷旨在收集有关政策形成过程、利益相关者和背景的定性数据。
该研究确定了影响心理健康政策制定的关键问题。这些问题包括在心理健康计划制定过程中需要纳入卫生部;时机的重要性;心理健康计划的实用性;冲突后背景对政策制定的影响;以及利益相关者群体的演变及其学习如何辩论心理健康改革优点的必要性。
鉴于方法上的局限性,研究结果具有形成性。然而,它为柬埔寨发生的政策制定过程动态提供了重要见解。这使得能够为柬埔寨和其他冲突后发展中国家未来的心理健康政策过程研究提出重要假设。