Gifford-Smith Mary, Dodge Kenneth A, Dishion Thomas J, McCord Joan
Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2005 Jun;33(3):255-65. doi: 10.1007/s10802-005-3563-7.
Considerable evidence supports the hypothesis that peer relationships influence the growth of problem behavior in youth. Developmental research consistently documents the high levels of covariation between peer and youth deviance, even controlling for selection effects. Ironically, the most common public interventions for deviant youth involve segregation from mainstream peers and aggregation into settings with other deviant youth. Developmental research on peer influence suggests that desired positive effects of group interventions in education, mental health, juvenile justice, and community programming may be offset by deviant peer influences in these settings. Given the public health policy issues raised by these findings, there is a need to better understand the conditions under which these peer contagion effects are most pronounced with respect to intervention foci and context, the child's developmental level, and specific strategies for managing youth behavior in groups.
大量证据支持这样一种假设,即同伴关系会影响青少年问题行为的发展。发展研究一直表明,即使控制了选择效应,同伴与青少年偏差行为之间仍存在高度的共变关系。具有讽刺意味的是,针对偏差行为青少年最常见的公共干预措施包括将他们与主流同伴隔离开来,并将他们聚集到与其他偏差行为青少年在一起的环境中。关于同伴影响的发展研究表明,在教育、心理健康、青少年司法和社区项目中,群体干预预期的积极效果可能会被这些环境中偏差同伴的影响所抵消。鉴于这些研究结果引发的公共卫生政策问题,有必要更好地了解在哪些条件下,就干预重点和背景、儿童的发展水平以及在群体中管理青少年行为的具体策略而言,这些同伴传染效应最为显著。