Sloan Frank A, Rattliff John R, Hall Mark A
Duke University, 125 Old Chemistry Bldg., Box 90253, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2005 Jun;40(3):647-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00378.x.
To assess effects of patient protection laws implemented by the vast majority of states during the 1990s on the public's satisfaction and trust relating to health care, and on key utilization measures.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Measures of individuals' health care utilization and satisfaction, and control variables, came from three waves of the Community Tracking Study (CTS) Household Surveys conducted in 1996-1997, 1998-1999, and 2000-2001. The CTS was conducted in 60 randomly selected communities, throughout the U.S. In addition, a supplemental national sample of households from CTS was also included, resulting in a combined sample with cases from 48 states and the District of Columbia. After applying exclusion restrictions, the analysis sample was 149,688 adults.
Using a fixed-effects methodology, we assessed the influence of patient protection laws on satisfaction with care and utilization of services for the entire sample and for subsamples of persons in poor health, with low income, and who were enrolled in HMOs.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: One of the authors (Hall) compiled relevant laws in all U.S. states through 2001 from primary legal sources, checking for accuracy by conducting independent research on statutory changes and by asking three to five regulators in each state to verify that the information was correct.
Overall, patient protection laws had little or no effect on either trust, satisfaction with care, or utilization. Significance was found postenactment of a state patient protection law only for emergency room visits in the general sample, and only for physician trust in the low-income sample. Because of the number of possible associations examined, occasional findings of significance could occur by chance.
Enactment of managed care patient protection laws did not generally increase utilization of health services or improve patient satisfaction with care.
评估20世纪90年代绝大多数州实施的患者保护法对公众在医疗保健方面的满意度和信任度以及关键使用指标的影响。
数据来源/研究背景:个人医疗保健使用情况和满意度的指标以及控制变量,来自于1996 - 1997年、1998 - 1999年和2000 - 2001年进行的三轮社区追踪研究(CTS)家庭调查。CTS在美国60个随机选取的社区进行。此外,还纳入了CTS的一个补充全国性家庭样本,从而形成了一个包含来自48个州和哥伦比亚特区案例的综合样本。在应用排除限制后,分析样本为149,688名成年人。
我们采用固定效应方法,评估患者保护法对整个样本以及健康状况不佳、低收入和参加健康维护组织(HMO)的子样本的护理满意度和服务使用情况的影响。
数据收集/提取方法:作者之一(霍尔)通过主要法律来源汇编了截至2001年美国所有州的相关法律,并通过对法规变化进行独立研究以及向每个州的三到五名监管人员询问以核实信息是否正确来检查准确性。
总体而言,患者保护法对信任、护理满意度或使用情况几乎没有影响。仅在一般样本中,州患者保护法颁布后急诊室就诊次数有显著变化,且仅在低收入样本中医生信任度有显著变化。由于检查的可能关联数量众多,偶尔出现的显著发现可能是偶然的。
管理式医疗患者保护法的颁布通常并未增加医疗服务的使用或提高患者对护理的满意度。