White Joseph
Department of Political Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7109, USA.
Milbank Q. 2007 Sep;85(3):395-448. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00494.x.
Many studies arguing for or against markets to finance medical care investigate "market-oriented" measures such as cost sharing. This article looks at the experience in the American medical marketplace over more than a decade, showing how markets function as institutions in which participants who are self-seeking, but not perfectly rational, exercise power over other participants in the market. Cost experience here was driven more by market power over prices than by management of utilization. Instead of following any logic of efficiency or equity, system transformations were driven by beliefs about investment strategies. At least in the United States' labor and capital markets, competition has shown little ability to rationalize health care systems because its goals do not resemble those of the health care system most people want.
许多支持或反对医疗保健市场融资的研究都考察了诸如成本分担等“以市场为导向”的措施。本文审视了美国医疗市场十多年来的情况,展示了市场如何作为一种制度发挥作用,在这个制度中,追求自身利益但并非完全理性的参与者对市场中的其他参与者行使权力。这里的成本情况更多地是由市场价格权力驱动,而非利用管理。系统变革并非遵循任何效率或公平逻辑,而是由对投资策略的信念驱动。至少在美国的劳动力和资本市场,竞争几乎没有能力使医疗保健系统合理化,因为其目标与大多数人所期望的医疗保健系统目标不同。