• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

独立学生学习小组。

Independent student study groups.

作者信息

Hendry Graham D, Hyde Sarah J, Davy Peter

机构信息

Office of Teaching and Learning in Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2005 Jul;39(7):672-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02199.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02199.x
PMID:15960787
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Teachers and students regulate learning to varying degrees in educational programmes in higher education. We present evidence that students in a student-centred medical programme self- and co-regulate their learning in independently formed study groups. We describe the perceived benefits of study groups and the effect of study group membership on student achievement.

SETTING

Years 1-2 of a 4-year, graduate-entry problem-based medical programme.

METHODS

We surveyed 233 year 2 students about features of their study groups and their study group membership in years 1-2. We compared study group membership with students' scores on a written summative assessment held at the end of their second year.

RESULTS

For students who joined 1 study group, the length of time their group stayed together was positively related to achievement in the written summative assessment. There were no differences in summative assessment results between students who had been in a study group and students who had not been in a study group.

CONCLUSION

Effective study groups are supportive, socially cohesive groups who generate mutual trust and loyalty, and self- and co-regulate their learning by giving and receiving explanations and summaries and motivating individual study. Teachers can support the formation of study groups by using small-group teaching/learning activities, providing clear learning outcomes and assessment criteria, minimising competition for grades and allocating room space.

摘要

背景与目的

在高等教育课程中,教师和学生在不同程度上对学习进行调节。我们提供证据表明,在以学生为中心的医学课程中,学生在自主形成的学习小组中自我调节和共同调节学习。我们描述了学习小组的感知益处以及学习小组成员身份对学生成绩的影响。

背景

一个为期4年、本科后入学、基于问题的医学课程的第1 - 2年。

方法

我们对233名二年级学生进行了调查,了解他们学习小组的特征以及他们在第1 - 2年的学习小组成员身份。我们将学习小组成员身份与学生在第二年结束时进行的书面总结性评估中的成绩进行了比较。

结果

对于加入一个学习小组的学生,他们小组在一起的时间长度与书面总结性评估中的成绩呈正相关。参加过学习小组的学生和未参加过学习小组的学生在总结性评估结果上没有差异。

结论

有效的学习小组是支持性的、具有社会凝聚力的群体,能产生相互信任和忠诚,并通过给予和接受解释与总结以及激励个人学习来自我调节和共同调节学习。教师可以通过开展小组教学/学习活动、提供明确的学习成果和评估标准、减少成绩竞争以及分配空间来支持学习小组的形成。

相似文献

1
Independent student study groups.独立学生学习小组。
Med Educ. 2005 Jul;39(7):672-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02199.x.
2
Student-led tutorials in problem-based learning: educational outcomes and students' perceptions.基于问题学习的学生主导辅导:教育成果与学生看法
Med Teach. 2005 Sep;27(6):521-6. doi: 10.1080/01421590500156186.
3
Implementing an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in dental education: effects on students' learning strategies.在牙科教育中实施客观结构化临床考试(OSCE):对学生学习策略的影响。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2006 Nov;10(4):226-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00421.x.
4
Self-managed learning groups in higher education: students' perceptions of process and outcomes.高等教育中的自主学习小组:学生对过程与结果的看法。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Sep;75(Pt 3):373-90. doi: 10.1348/000709905X25355.
5
Students' conceptions of constructivist learning in different programme years and different learning environments.不同课程年份和不同学习环境下学生对建构主义学习的理解。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Sep;79(Pt 3):501-14. doi: 10.1348/000709908X378117. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
6
An effective integrated learning programme in the first year of the medical course.医学课程第一年的一个有效的综合学习项目。
Natl Med J India. 2008 Jan-Feb;21(1):21-6.
7
Students' evolution of a learning method: a comparison between problem-based learning and more traditional methods in a specialist university training programme in psychotherapy.
Med Teach. 2002 May;24(3):268-71.
8
Lessons learned from a study-group pilot program for medical students perceived to be 'at risk'.从一项针对被认为“有风险”的医学生的学习小组试点项目中吸取的经验教训。
Med Teach. 2007 Mar;29(2-3):e37-40. doi: 10.1080/01421590601034688.
9
Prior academic background and student performance in assessment in a graduate entry programme.研究生入学项目中的先前学术背景和学生在评估中的表现。
Med Educ. 2004 Nov;38(11):1164-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02043.x.
10
Gender-related differences in learning in student-led PBL tutorials.学生主导的基于问题的学习教程中学习的性别差异。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2005 Jul;18(2):272-82. doi: 10.1080/13576280500148577.

引用本文的文献

1
Putting self-regulated learning in context: Integrating self-, co-, and socially shared regulation of learning.将自我调节学习置于情境中:整合自我、共同和社会共享的学习调节。
Med Educ. 2022 Jan;56(1):29-36. doi: 10.1111/medu.14566. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
2
Students' Scientific Society--how to inspire students and help them to become oncologists? A tutor's perspective.学生科学协会——如何激励学生并帮助他们成为肿瘤学家?一位导师的观点。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Mar;29(1):11-3. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0587-5.
3
Student approaches for learning in medicine: what does it tell us about the informal curriculum?
学生在医学中的学习方法:它向我们揭示了非正式课程的哪些方面?
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Oct 21;11:87. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-87.
4
Reflection on studies on the learning process in problem-based learning.关于基于问题的学习中学习过程的研究反思。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 Oct;16(4):437-41. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9319-y. Epub 2011 Aug 23.