Altorjay Aron, Kiss János, Paál Balázs, Tihanyi Zoltán, Luka Ferenc, Farsang Zoltán, Asztalos Imre, Altorjay István
Department of Surgery, Saint George University Teaching Hospital, Seregélyesi ut 3, H-8000 Székesfehérvár, Hungary.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Aug;28(2):296-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.04.039.
Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a poor long-term substitute. This anatomical configuration abolishes normal antireflux mechanisms and places the acid-excreting stomach subject to biliary reflux, moreover, in an adjacent position to the esophagus within the negative-pressure environment of the thorax.
Between 1995 and 2002, 27 patients with high-grade neoplasia-as early Barrett's carcinoma-or non-dilatable peptic stricture underwent limited surgical resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In 11 of these cases, the reconstruction was performed with gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition. The long-term functional results of this specially adapted form of interposition reconstruction have been evaluated. The postoperative follow-up period ranged between 24 and 95 months (mean 68 months). Nine patients (9/11=81.8%) have agreed to undergo endoscopy, radiographic contrast-swallow examination, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring.
Three out of nine patients (3/9=33%) demonstrated abnormal levels of esophageal acid exposure during the 24-h study period, whilst none had any evidence of bilirubin exposure in the esophageal remnant. Endoscopy revealed that three patients had reflux esophagitis in the remnant esophagus: Los Angeles A=2, C=1. No stomal or jejunal ulceration at the gastro-jejunal anastomosis could be observed. Histopathologic assessment of the squamous epithelial biopsies demonstrated microscopic evidence of inflammation: minor in two cases, moderate in one and major in one case; however, none of them had evidence of columnar metaplasia in the esophageal remnant at a median of 68 months after surgery. The majority of the patients have been doing well since the operation: 8/9 (88%)=Visick I-II.
Gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition represents an adequate 'second-best' method of choice if technical difficulties emerge with jejunal or colon interposition following limited resection of the esophagus performed due to early Barett's carcinoma or non-dilatable peptic stricture.
尽管从安全性和操作简便性的角度来看,胃是食管切除术后重建的最佳选择,但胸内胃作为长期替代物效果不佳。这种解剖结构破坏了正常的抗反流机制,使分泌胃酸的胃易发生胆汁反流,此外,在胸腔的负压环境中,胃与食管相邻。
1995年至2002年期间,27例患有高级别瘤变(早期巴雷特食管癌)或不可扩张的消化性狭窄的患者接受了远端食管和食管胃交界部的有限手术切除。其中11例采用胃空肠十二指肠间置术进行重建。对这种特殊形式的间置重建的长期功能结果进行了评估。术后随访时间为24至95个月(平均68个月)。9例患者(9/11 = 81.8%)同意接受内镜检查、X线吞钡造影检查以及24小时动态食管pH值和胆红素监测。
在9例患者中,3例(3/9 = 33%)在24小时研究期间食管酸暴露水平异常,而食管残端均未发现胆红素暴露的证据。内镜检查显示,3例患者残端食管有反流性食管炎:洛杉矶分级A = 2例,C = 1例。未观察到胃空肠吻合口处的吻合口或空肠溃疡。鳞状上皮活检的组织病理学评估显示有炎症的微观证据:2例为轻度,1例为中度,1例为重度;然而,在术后中位时间68个月时,食管残端均未发现柱状上皮化生的证据。大多数患者术后情况良好:8/9(88%)= Visick I-II级。
如果因早期巴雷特食管癌或不可扩张性消化性狭窄行食管有限切除术后,空肠或结肠间置出现技术困难,胃空肠十二指肠间置是一种合适的“次优”选择方法。