Suppr超能文献

床边ABO血型检测失败仍是条形码时代输血错误的最常见原因。

Failure of bedside ABO testing is still the most common cause of incorrect blood transfusion in the Barcode era.

作者信息

Ahrens Norbert, Pruss Axel, Kiesewetter Holger, Salama Abdulgabar

机构信息

Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Transfus Apher Sci. 2005 Aug;33(1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2005.04.006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

ABO-incompatible red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are a major risk in transfusion medicine. Identification of factors leading to this hazard is important to improve transfusion safety.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All consecutive erroneous ABO-incompatible transfusions occurring from January 1997 to December 2004 at the Charité University Hospital in Berlin, Germany were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 343,432 RBC units were transfused, and eight patients erroneously received 13 ABO-incompatible RBC concentrates. The most frequent error was incorrect bedside testing (n=7). Intensive care treatment was required in two cases, but there were no fatal mistransfusions. Four patients had no or only mild reactions.

CONCLUSION

Mistransfusions are still a considerable risk in transfusion medicine despite quality control systems and electronic data processing. An increase in transfusion safety may require the introduction of further systems, e.g. radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags.

摘要

背景与目的

ABO血型不相容的红细胞(RBC)输血是输血医学中的一项主要风险。识别导致这种风险的因素对于提高输血安全性至关重要。

材料与方法

分析了1997年1月至2004年12月期间在德国柏林夏里特大学医院发生的所有连续的错误ABO血型不相容输血事件。

结果

共输注了343,432个红细胞单位,8名患者错误地接受了13个ABO血型不相容的红细胞浓缩液。最常见的错误是床边检测错误(n = 7)。2例患者需要重症监护治疗,但没有致命的误输血事件。4例患者没有反应或仅有轻微反应。

结论

尽管有质量控制系统和电子数据处理,误输血在输血医学中仍然是一个相当大的风险。提高输血安全性可能需要引入进一步的系统,例如射频识别(RFID)标签。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验