Seifert L, Chollet D, Allard P
CETAPS Laboratory, UPRES EA 3832: University of Rouen, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Boulevard Siegfried, 76821 Mont Saint Aignan Cedex, France.
Hum Mov Sci. 2005 Apr;24(2):234-56. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.05.003.
This study analysed the relationships among arm coordination symmetry, motor laterality and breathing laterality during a 100-m front crawl, as a function of expertise. Ten elite swimmers (G1), 10 mid-level swimmers (G2), and 8 non-expert swimmers (G3) composed three skill groups, which were distinguished by velocity, stroke rate, stroke length, breathing frequency (BF) and the mean number of strokes between two breaths - the stroke breath (SB) - over a 100-m front crawl. Four stroke phases were identified by video analysis (catch, pull, push and recovery) and the index of coordination (IdC) measured the lag time between the propulsive phases of the two arms. The three modes of coordination are catch-up (IdC<0%), opposition (IdC=0%) and superposition (IdC>0%). The IdC was established as the mean of IdC1 and IdC2, which measured the lag time between the propulsive phases of the left and right arms, respectively. The coordination symmetry was analysed by comparing IdC1 and IdC2, and the breathing effect was studied by distinguishing IdC1 (and IdC2) with and without breathing. Motor laterality was determined by an adaptation of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Breathing laterality was determined by a questionnaire and observation during the 100-m trial. Most of the front crawl swimmers showed asymmetric arm coordination, with propulsive discontinuity on one side and propulsive superposition on the other. This asymmetry was most often related to breathing laterality (a preferential breathing side for a unilateral breathing pattern) and motor laterality (arm dominance), with different profiles noted. More than the breathing laterality itself, the breathing actions of the non-expert swimmers amplified their asymmetric coordination on the breathing side. Conversely, the elite swimmers, who had higher and more stable spatial-temporal parameters (velocity and stroke lengths), a high coordination value (IdC) and lower breathing frequency (BF), managed their race better than the less proficient swimmers and their asymmetric arm coordination was not disturbed by breathing actions. By determining the dominant arm and the preferential breathing side, the coach can obtain a swimmer profile that allows both coach and swimmer to better understand and respond to excessive coordination asymmetry.
本研究分析了100米自由泳过程中手臂协调性对称、运动偏侧性和呼吸偏侧性之间的关系,并将其作为专业水平的函数进行研究。十名精英游泳运动员(G1组)、十名中级游泳运动员(G2组)和八名非专业游泳运动员(G3组)组成了三个技能组,通过100米自由泳的速度、划水频率、划水长度、呼吸频率(BF)以及两次呼吸之间的平均划水次数——划水呼吸比(SB)来区分。通过视频分析确定了四个划水阶段(抓水、划水、推水和移臂),协调性指数(IdC)测量了两臂推进阶段之间的时间滞后。三种协调模式为追赶(IdC<0%)、对抗(IdC=0%)和叠加(IdC>0%)。IdC被确定为IdC1和IdC2的平均值,IdC1和IdC2分别测量左右臂推进阶段之间的时间滞后。通过比较IdC1和IdC2分析协调性对称,并通过区分有呼吸和无呼吸时的IdC1(和IdC2)研究呼吸效应。运动偏侧性通过改编的爱丁堡利手问卷来确定。呼吸偏侧性通过问卷调查和100米测试期间的观察来确定。大多数自由泳运动员表现出不对称的手臂协调性,一侧有推进间断,另一侧有推进叠加。这种不对称最常与呼吸偏侧性(单侧呼吸模式的偏好呼吸侧)和运动偏侧性(手臂优势)有关,观察到了不同的特征。与呼吸偏侧性本身相比,非专业游泳运动员的呼吸动作放大了他们在呼吸侧的不对称协调性。相反,精英游泳运动员具有更高且更稳定的时空参数(速度和划水长度)、高协调性值(IdC)和更低的呼吸频率(BF),他们比不太熟练的游泳运动员更能掌控比赛,并且他们不对称的手臂协调性不会受到呼吸动作的干扰。通过确定优势手臂和偏好呼吸侧,教练可以获得游泳运动员的特征信息,这有助于教练和运动员更好地理解并应对过度的协调性不对称。