Johansen A, Olsson S
Department of Environmental Chemistry and Microbiology, National Environmental Research Institute, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000, Roskilde, Denmark.
Microb Ecol. 2005 Feb;49(2):272-81. doi: 10.1007/s00248-004-0135-2. Epub 2005 Jun 17.
The biological control agent (BCA) Pseudomonas fluorescens DR54 was applied to seeds (experiment 1) or roots (experiment 2) of barley growing in microcosms, while noninoculated plants served as controls. The fate of the BCA and its effects on the rhizosphere microbial community was evaluated in microcosms destructively sampled at days 2, 4, 6, and 9 after inoculation. In both experiments the number of P. fluorescens DR54 cells decreased immediately after application as enumerated by immunostaining and microscope direct counting. Substrate-induced respiration (SIR) was taken as a measurement of the active microbial biomass, while indicators of the total microbiota (and main taxonomic groups) were obtained using the phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) technique. In experiment 1, these parameters were unaffected by the relatively small number of BCA cells applied, whereas in experiment 2, the larger BCA input resulted in an enhanced level of both SIR and PLFAs from Gram-negative bacteria (which included the BCA itself). However, at day 9 after inoculation, treatments with P. fluorescens DR54 and controls were similar in all measured parameters in both experiments. This was also illustrated very clearly by principal component analysis of the PLFA data, which in both experiments were able to discriminate between treatments in the first days after BCA inoculation, thus confirming the sensitivity of this method. Laccase activity has a potential as an indicator of fungal stress, e.g., when challenged with an antifungal BCA. This seemed to be supported in experiment 2, where the activity of this enzyme was enhanced four-fold in the BCA treatment at day 2. Our study shows that under the present conditions, P. fluorescens DR54 disappears from the soil and causes only transient effects on the soil microbiota. It also shows that the PLFA technique is a sensitive and reliable monitoring tool in in situ assessment of BCA nontarget effect on indigenous microorganisms in soil.
将生防菌荧光假单胞菌DR54施用于生长在微观环境中的大麦种子(实验1)或根部(实验2),未接种的植株作为对照。在接种后第2、4、6和9天对微观环境进行破坏性采样,评估生防菌的归宿及其对根际微生物群落的影响。在两个实验中,通过免疫染色和显微镜直接计数发现,荧光假单胞菌DR54细胞数量在施用后立即减少。底物诱导呼吸作用(SIR)用作活性微生物生物量的度量指标,而使用磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)技术获得总微生物群(和主要分类群)的指标。在实验1中,施用的生防菌细胞数量相对较少,这些参数未受影响;而在实验2中,生防菌输入量较大,导致SIR水平以及革兰氏阴性菌(包括生防菌本身)的PLFAs均有所提高。然而,在接种后第9天,两个实验中荧光假单胞菌DR54处理组和对照组的所有测量参数均相似。PLFA数据的主成分分析也非常清楚地表明了这一点,在两个实验中,该分析都能够在生防菌接种后的头几天区分不同处理,从而证实了该方法的敏感性。漆酶活性有可能作为真菌胁迫的指标,例如在受到抗真菌生防菌挑战时。这似乎在实验2中得到了支持,在该实验中,第2天BCA处理组中该酶的活性提高了四倍。我们的研究表明,在当前条件下,荧光假单胞菌DR54从土壤中消失,仅对土壤微生物群产生短暂影响。研究还表明,PLFA技术是原位评估生防菌对土壤中土著微生物非靶标效应的一种灵敏且可靠的监测工具。