Suppr超能文献

巴西稀树草原中树木密度梯度上的季节性叶片动态

Seasonal leaf dynamics across a tree density gradient in a Brazilian savanna.

作者信息

Hoffmann William A, da Silva Edson Rangel, Machado Gustavo C, Bucci Sandra J, Scholz Fabian G, Goldstein Guillermo, Meinzer Frederick C

机构信息

Department of Botany, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7612, Raleigh, NC 28695-7612, USA.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2005 Sep;145(2):307-16. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0129-x. Epub 2005 Oct 25.

Abstract

Interactions between trees and grasses that influence leaf area index (LAI) have important consequences for savanna ecosystem processes through their controls on water, carbon, and energy fluxes as well as fire regimes. We measured LAI, of the groundlayer (herbaceous and woody plants <1-m tall) and shrub and tree layer (woody plants >1-m tall), in the Brazilian cerrado over a range of tree densities from open shrub savanna to closed woodland through the annual cycle. During the dry season, soil water potential was strongly and positively correlated with grass LAI, and less strongly with tree and shrub LAI. By the end of the dry season, LAI of grasses, groundlayer dicots and trees declined to 28, 60, and 68% of mean wet-season values, respectively. We compared the data to remotely sensed vegetation indices, finding that field measurements were more strongly correlated to the enhanced vegetation index (EVI, r (2)=0.71) than to the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI, r (2)=0.49). Although the latter has been more widely used in quantifying leaf dynamics of tropical savannas, EVI appears better suited for this purpose. Our ground-based measurements demonstrate that groundlayer LAI declines with increasing tree density across sites, with savanna grasses being excluded at a tree LAI of approximately 3.3. LAI averaged 4.2 in nearby gallery (riparian) forest, so savanna grasses were absent, thereby greatly reducing fire risk and permitting survival of fire-sensitive forest tree species. Although edaphic conditions may partly explain the larger tree LAI of forests, relative to savanna, biological differences between savanna and forest tree species play an important role. Overall, forest tree species had 48% greater LAI than congeneric savanna trees under similar growing conditions. Savanna and forest species play distinct roles in the structure and dynamics of savanna-forest boundaries, contributing to the differences in fire regimes, microclimate, and nutrient cycling between savanna and forest ecosystems.

摘要

树木与草本植物之间的相互作用会影响叶面积指数(LAI),通过对水、碳和能量通量以及火灾状况的控制,对热带稀树草原生态系统过程产生重要影响。我们在巴西塞拉多地区,通过年度周期,测量了从开阔灌木稀树草原到封闭林地的一系列树木密度下,地被层(草本植物和高度小于1米的木本植物)以及灌木和乔木层(高度大于1米的木本植物)的叶面积指数。在旱季,土壤水势与草本植物叶面积指数呈强正相关,与树木和灌木叶面积指数的相关性较弱。到旱季结束时,草本植物、地被层双子叶植物和树木的叶面积指数分别降至平均湿季值的28%、60%和68%。我们将这些数据与遥感植被指数进行比较,发现实地测量与增强植被指数(EVI,r² = 0.71)的相关性比与归一化植被指数(NDVI,r² = 0.49)更强。尽管后者在量化热带稀树草原的叶片动态方面应用更为广泛,但EVI似乎更适合此目的。我们的地面测量表明,地被层叶面积指数随各地点树木密度的增加而下降,当树木叶面积指数约为3.3时,稀树草原草本植物被排除在外。附近的长廊(河岸)森林中叶面积指数平均为4.2,因此没有稀树草原草本植物,从而大大降低了火灾风险,并使对火敏感的森林树种得以存活。尽管土壤条件可能部分解释了森林中树木叶面积指数较大的原因,但相对于稀树草原,稀树草原和森林树种之间的生物学差异也起着重要作用。总体而言,在相似的生长条件下,森林树种的叶面积指数比同属的稀树草原树种大48%。稀树草原和森林物种在稀树草原 - 森林边界的结构和动态中发挥着不同的作用,导致了稀树草原和森林生态系统在火灾状况、小气候和养分循环方面的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验