Tsalyuk Miriam, Kelly Maggi, Getz Wayne M
Department of Environmental Sciences, Policy & Management, 130 Mulford Hall #3114, University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, USA.
School of Mathematical Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X54001, Durban 4000, South Africa.
ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2017 Sep;131:77-91. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
African savanna vegetation is subject to extensive degradation as a result of rapid climate and land use change. To better understand these changes detailed assessment of vegetation structure is needed across an extensive spatial scale and at a fine temporal resolution. Applying remote sensing techniques to savanna vegetation is challenging due to sparse cover, high background soil signal, and difficulty to differentiate between spectral signals of bare soil and dry vegetation. In this paper, we attempt to resolve these challenges by analyzing time series of four MODIS Vegetation Products (VPs): Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Leaf Area Index (LAI), and Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FPAR) for Etosha National Park, a semiarid savanna in north-central Namibia. We create models to predict the density, cover, and biomass of the main savanna vegetation forms: grass, shrubs, and trees. To calibrate remote sensing data we developed an extensive and relatively rapid field methodology and measured herbaceous and woody vegetation during both the dry and wet seasons. We compared the efficacy of the four MODIS-derived VPs in predicting vegetation field measured variables. We then compared the optimal time span of VP time series to predict ground-measured vegetation. We found that Multiyear Partial Least Square Regression (PLSR) models were superior to single year or single date models. Our results show that NDVI-based PLSR models yield robust prediction of tree density ( =0.79, relative Root Mean Square Error, rRMSE=1.9%) and tree cover ( =0.78, rRMSE=0.3%). EVI provided the best model for shrub density ( =0.82) and shrub cover ( =0.83), but was only marginally superior over models based on other VPs. FPAR was the best predictor of vegetation biomass of trees ( =0.76), shrubs ( =0.83), and grass ( =0.91). Finally, we addressed an enduring challenge in the remote sensing of semiarid vegetation by examining the transferability of predictive models through space and time. Our results show that models created in the wetter part of Etosha could accurately predict trees' and shrubs' variables in the drier part of the reserve and vice versa. Moreover, our results demonstrate that models created for vegetation variables in the dry season of 2011 could be successfully applied to predict vegetation in the wet season of 2012. We conclude that extensive field data combined with multiyear time series of MODIS vegetation products can produce robust predictive models for multiple vegetation forms in the African savanna. These methods advance the monitoring of savanna vegetation dynamics and contribute to improved management and conservation of these valuable ecosystems.
由于气候和土地利用的快速变化,非洲热带稀树草原植被正遭受广泛退化。为了更好地理解这些变化,需要在广阔的空间尺度和精细的时间分辨率上对植被结构进行详细评估。由于植被覆盖稀疏、土壤背景信号强以及难以区分裸土和干燥植被的光谱信号,将遥感技术应用于热带稀树草原植被具有挑战性。在本文中,我们试图通过分析四个MODIS植被产品(VP)的时间序列来解决这些挑战:归一化植被指数(NDVI)、增强植被指数(EVI)、叶面积指数(LAI)和光合有效辐射比例(FPAR),研究对象是纳米比亚中北部半干旱热带稀树草原的埃托沙国家公园。我们创建模型来预测主要热带稀树草原植被类型(草、灌木和树木)的密度、覆盖度和生物量。为了校准遥感数据,我们开发了一种广泛且相对快速的野外方法,并在旱季和雨季测量草本和木本植被。我们比较了四个源自MODIS的VP在预测植被实地测量变量方面的效果。然后,我们比较了VP时间序列预测地面实测植被的最佳时间跨度。我们发现多年偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)模型优于单年或单日模型。我们的结果表明,基于NDVI的PLSR模型对树木密度(R² = 0.79,相对均方根误差,rRMSE = 1.9%)和树木覆盖度(R² = 0.78,rRMSE = 0.3%)有可靠的预测。EVI为灌木密度(R² = 0.82)和灌木覆盖度(R² = 0.83)提供了最佳模型,但仅略优于基于其他VP的模型。FPAR是树木(R² = 0.76)、灌木(R² = 0.83)和草(R² = 0.91)植被生物量的最佳预测指标。最后,我们通过研究预测模型在空间和时间上的可转移性,解决了半干旱植被遥感中的一个长期挑战。我们的结果表明,在埃托沙较湿润地区创建的模型可以准确预测保护区较干燥地区树木和灌木的变量,反之亦然。此外,我们的结果表明,为2011年旱季植被变量创建的模型可以成功应用于预测2012年雨季的植被。我们得出结论,广泛的野外数据与MODIS植被产品的多年时间序列相结合,可以为非洲热带稀树草原的多种植被类型生成可靠的预测模型。这些方法推进了对热带稀树草原植被动态的监测,并有助于改善对这些宝贵生态系统的管理和保护。