Suppr超能文献

关于基质的另一种观点:交互作用论。

Another take on the matrix: interactionism.

作者信息

Brehm Sharon Stephens

机构信息

Indiana University Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2005 Sep;61(9):1091-3. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20143.

Abstract

This response to C.R. Snyder and T.R. Elliott's article, "Twenty-First Century Graduate Education in Clinical Psychology: A Four Level Matrix Model" (this issue, PP 1033-1054), focuses on the importance of three types of interactions: between mind and body, humans and machines, and individuals and groups. It is proposed that the clinical psychology training programs of the future will need to ensure that their students are well versed in the relevance of these interactions for understanding human behavior and developing effective treatments.

摘要

这篇对C.R. 斯奈德和T.R. 埃利奥特所著文章《临床心理学的21世纪研究生教育:一个四级矩阵模型》(本期,第1033 - 1054页)的回应,聚焦于三种互动类型的重要性:身心之间、人与机器之间以及个体与群体之间。文章提出,未来的临床心理学培训项目需要确保其学生精通这些互动对于理解人类行为和开发有效治疗方法的相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验