Brochut P F, Marin I, Baehni P, Mombelli A
School of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.
J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Jul;32(7):695-701. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00730.x.
To compare the clinical and microbiological outcome of non-surgical periodontal therapy after 6 months with data obtained after hygienic phase or 6 weeks after completion of non-surgical therapy, in order to evaluate the value of clinical and microbiological parameters to predict treatment success.
Clinical and microbiological data were available from 271 sites in 10 systemically healthy non-smokers with moderate-to-advanced chronic periodontal disease (24-32 sites per individual). Subgingival plaque samples were tested for the presence of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Tannerella forsythensis and Treponema denticola using RNA probes.
Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed a significant impact of the number of sites with visible plaque index >1 after hygienic phase on the bleeding tendency of a subject at month 6 (p<0.01). Furthermore, an association could be demonstrated between the number of residual pockets (PD>3 mm) 6 months after therapy and the number of bleeding sites and suppurating sites after hygienic phase (p=0.016). Six weeks after therapy, the mean total bacterial loads had a significant impact on the bleeding tendency of a subject at month 6 (p<0.01). Although the average numbers of sites with persisting P. gingivalis, A. actinomycetemcomitans, T. forsythensis and T. denticola seemed to be very similar 6 weeks and 6 months after therapy, large variations were noted between subjects, and therefore the microbiological status of a subject at week 6 could not predict the status at month 6.
The present study showed a limited potential of microbiological tests, performed after hygienic phase or shortly after non-surgical periodontal therapy, to predict the clinical outcome 6 months later, but confirmed the importance of an establishment of perfect oral hygiene before non-surgical therapy.
将非手术牙周治疗6个月后的临床和微生物学结果与卫生阶段后或非手术治疗完成6周后获得的数据进行比较,以评估临床和微生物学参数对预测治疗成功的价值。
从10名全身健康的非吸烟者的271个位点获取了临床和微生物学数据,这些患者患有中度至重度慢性牙周病(每人24 - 32个位点)。使用RNA探针检测龈下菌斑样本中牙龈卟啉单胞菌、伴放线放线杆菌、福赛坦氏菌和具核梭杆菌的存在情况。
逐步多元线性回归分析显示,卫生阶段后可见菌斑指数>1的位点数量对受试者在第6个月时的出血倾向有显著影响(p<0.01)。此外,治疗6个月后残留牙周袋(探诊深度>3 mm)的数量与卫生阶段后的出血位点数量和化脓位点数量之间存在关联(p = 0.016)。治疗6周后,平均总细菌载量对受试者在第6个月时的出血倾向有显著影响(p<0.01)。尽管治疗6周和6个月后,牙龈卟啉单胞菌、伴放线放线杆菌、福赛坦氏菌和具核梭杆菌持续存在的位点平均数量似乎非常相似,但个体之间存在很大差异,因此受试者在第6周时的微生物学状态无法预测第6个月时的状态。
本研究表明,在卫生阶段后或非手术牙周治疗后不久进行的微生物学检测预测6个月后临床结果的潜力有限,但证实了在非手术治疗前建立良好口腔卫生的重要性。