Ekelund K, Skinhøj P, Madsen J, Konradsen H B
Department of Bacteriology, Mycology and Parasitology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Jul;11(7):569-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01169.x.
Group A streptococci (GAS) have been described frequently as an emerging cause of severe invasive infections in population-based surveillance studies, whereas the descriptions of group B, C and G streptococci (GBS, GCS and GGS) have been less frequent. Enhanced surveillance for invasive GAS, GBS, GCS and GGS was performed in Denmark in 1999-2002. A detailed questionnaire was completed for 1237 (98%) of 1260 invasive infections. GAS infections dominated (40%), followed by GGS (32%), GBS (23%) and GCS (6%). Most (74%) patients had predisposing factors, and there were no significant differences between the four serogroups when comparing the prevalence of cancer, diabetes mellitus, chronic heart or lung diseases, immunodeficiency or alcohol abuse. The overall case fatality rate at day 30 was 21%, increasing significantly to 59% for patients with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS). STSS was significantly more frequent in GAS patients (10%) than in GCS (4%), GBS (2%) and GGS (2%) patients. Regression analyses showed that, despite a younger median age among GAS patients, the probability of developing septic shock and mortality was significantly higher among GAS patients than among GBS and GGS patients. These analyses showed no significant differences between GAS and GCS infections. Invasive infections caused by GAS, GBS, GCS and GGS are still a major challenge for clinicians. Continued epidemiological and microbiological surveillance is important to assess the development of these infections and to improve preventative strategies.
在基于人群的监测研究中,A 组链球菌(GAS)常被描述为严重侵袭性感染的新兴病因,而 B、C 和 G 组链球菌(GBS、GCS 和 GGS)的相关描述则较少。1999 年至 2002 年在丹麦对侵袭性 GAS、GBS、GCS 和 GGS 进行了强化监测。针对 1260 例侵袭性感染中的 1237 例(98%)完成了详细问卷。GAS 感染占主导(40%),其次是 GGS(32%)、GBS(23%)和 GCS(6%)。大多数(74%)患者有易感因素,在比较癌症、糖尿病、慢性心肺疾病、免疫缺陷或酗酒的患病率时,四个血清群之间无显著差异。30 天时的总体病死率为 21%,对于链球菌中毒性休克综合征(STSS)患者,病死率显著升至 59%。STSS 在 GAS 患者中(10%)比在 GCS(4%)、GBS(2%)和 GGS(2%)患者中更常见。回归分析表明,尽管 GAS 患者的年龄中位数较小,但 GAS 患者发生感染性休克和死亡的概率显著高于 GBS 和 GGS 患者。这些分析显示 GAS 和 GCS 感染之间无显著差异。GAS、GBS、GCS 和 GGS 引起的侵袭性感染对临床医生来说仍是一项重大挑战。持续的流行病学和微生物学监测对于评估这些感染的发展情况以及改进预防策略很重要。