Hunter Billie
University of Wales Swansea, School of Health Sciences, Vivian Tower, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Midwifery. 2005 Sep;21(3):253-66. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.12.007.
To identify and explore the emotion work of hospital-based midwives.
An ethnographic approach using focus groups, observations and interviews.
South Wales, UK.
Phase one of the study: self-selected convenience sample of 27 student midwives in first and final years of 3-year (direct entry) and 18-month (post-nursing) programmes. Phase two: opportunistic sample of seven qualified hospital-based midwives. Phase three: Purposive sample of 10 hospital-based midwives working within one National Health Service Trust. Sample representative of a range of clinical locations, length of clinical experience and clinical grades.
The emotion work of midwives was strongly influenced by the context of practice. For hospital-based midwives, relationships with midwifery colleagues were of key importance, providing the main source of feedback on individual practice. Negotiating these relationships was a major source of emotion work. Although collegial relationships could provide support and affirmation, they were also a frequent source of conflict, particularly between junior and senior midwives. This discord was underpinned by conflicting ideologies of midwifery practice.
The theoretical framework of boundary maintenance was used to interpret the findings. Senior and junior midwives frequently held contradictory models of practice, resulting in competing claims for occupational jurisdiction. Midwives made use of a variety of devices in order to establish and maintain intra-occupational boundaries. Senior midwives attempted to maintain their position through unwritten rules and sanctions, supported by their claim to greater clinical expertise and experience. Junior midwives rarely challenged this authority; their responses were often subversive and designed to create an appearance of compliance.
These findings contribute to our understanding of inter-collegial conflict in UK midwifery, providing insights into workplace harassment and low staff morale, which are likely to exacerbate workforce attrition. The underpinning ideological dissonance experienced by midwives must be acknowledged and tackled for these issues to be effectively addressed.
识别并探究医院助产士的情感劳动。
采用焦点小组、观察和访谈的人种志方法。
英国南威尔士。
研究的第一阶段:从3年制(直接入学)和18个月制(护理后入学)课程的一年级和最后一年的27名助产专业学生中进行自我选择的便利样本。第二阶段:7名合格的医院助产士的机会性样本。第三阶段:从一个国民保健服务信托机构中工作的10名医院助产士中进行的目的性样本。样本代表了一系列临床地点、临床经验长度和临床等级。
助产士的情感劳动受到实践环境的强烈影响。对于医院助产士来说,与助产同事的关系至关重要,是个人实践反馈的主要来源。协调这些关系是情感劳动的主要来源。尽管同事关系可以提供支持和肯定,但它们也是冲突的常见来源,尤其是在初级和高级助产士之间。这种不和的背后是助产实践的相互冲突的意识形态。
使用边界维持的理论框架来解释研究结果。高级和初级助产士经常持有相互矛盾的实践模式,导致对职业管辖权的竞争主张。助产士使用了各种手段来建立和维持职业内部的边界。高级助产士试图通过不成文的规则和制裁来维持自己的地位,他们声称自己拥有更丰富的临床专业知识和经验。初级助产士很少挑战这种权威;他们的反应往往是颠覆性的,旨在营造一种顺从的表象。
这些发现有助于我们理解英国助产行业的同事间冲突,深入了解职场骚扰和员工士气低落的问题,而这些问题可能会加剧劳动力流失。必须认识到并解决助产士所经历的潜在意识形态分歧,才能有效解决这些问题。