Taddio Anna, Soin Herpreet Kaur, Schuh Suzanne, Koren Gideon, Scolnik Dennis
The Department of Pharmacy and the Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ. 2005 Jun 21;172(13):1691-5. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.045316.
Historically, children have been undertreated for their pain, and they continue to undergo painful cutaneous procedures without analgesics. A new topical anesthetic, liposomal lidocaine 4% cream (Maxilene, RGR Pharma, Windsor, Ont.), has become available. It has pharmacologic properties that are superior to other topical anesthetics, including an onset of action of only 30 minutes. We sought to determine the success rate of cannulation, analgesic effectiveness, procedure duration and rate of adverse skin reactions when liposomal lidocaine is used before intravenous cannulation of children.
In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, children aged 1 month to 17 years received liposomal lidocaine or placebo before cannulation. Success on first cannulation attempt was recorded, and, among children 5 years and older, pain was evaluated before and after the attempt by the child, parents and research assistant using a validated measure (Faces Pain Scale-Revised). For children younger than 5 years, pain was evaluated by the parents and research assistant only. The total duration of the procedure and adverse skin reactions were also recorded.
Baseline characteristics did not differ (p > 0.05) between children who received liposomal lidocaine (n = 69) and those who received placebo (n = 73). Cannulation on the first attempt was achieved in 74% of children who received liposomal lidocaine compared with 55% of those who received placebo (p = 0.03). Among children 5 years of age and older (n = 67), lower mean pain scores during cannulation were reported by those receiving liposomal lidocaine (p = 0.01). Similarly, lower mean pain scores during cannulation were reported by the parents and research assistant for all children who received liposomal lidocaine than for all those who received placebo (p < 0.001). The mean total procedure duration was shorter with liposomal lidocaine (6.7 v. 8.5 minutes; p = 0.04). The incidence of transient dermal changes was 23% in both groups (p = 1.0).
Use of liposomal lidocaine was associated with a higher intravenous cannulation success rate, less pain, shorter total procedure time and minor dermal changes among children undergoing cannulation. Its routine use for painful cutaneous procedures should be considered whenever feasible.
从历史上看,儿童的疼痛一直未得到充分治疗,他们在进行痛苦的皮肤操作时仍未使用镇痛药。一种新型局部麻醉剂——4%脂质体利多卡因乳膏(Maxilene,RGR制药公司,安大略省温莎市)已上市。它具有优于其他局部麻醉剂的药理特性,包括起效时间仅为30分钟。我们试图确定在儿童静脉置管前使用脂质体利多卡因时的置管成功率、镇痛效果、操作持续时间和皮肤不良反应发生率。
在这项双盲随机对照试验中,1个月至17岁的儿童在置管前接受脂质体利多卡因或安慰剂。记录首次置管尝试的成功率,对于5岁及以上的儿童,由儿童、家长和研究助理在尝试前后使用经过验证的量表(面部疼痛量表修订版)评估疼痛。对于5岁以下的儿童,仅由家长和研究助理评估疼痛。还记录了操作的总持续时间和皮肤不良反应。
接受脂质体利多卡因的儿童(n = 69)和接受安慰剂的儿童(n = 73)的基线特征无差异(p > 0.05)。接受脂质体利多卡因的儿童中,74%首次尝试置管成功,而接受安慰剂的儿童中这一比例为55%(p = 0.03)。在5岁及以上的儿童(n = 67)中,接受脂质体利多卡因的儿童在置管过程中的平均疼痛评分较低(p = 0.01)。同样,接受脂质体利多卡因的所有儿童的家长和研究助理报告的置管过程中的平均疼痛评分低于接受安慰剂的所有儿童(p < 0.001)。脂质体利多卡因的平均总操作持续时间较短(6.7对8.5分钟;p = 0.04)。两组的短暂皮肤变化发生率均为23%(p = 1.0)。
在接受置管的儿童中,使用脂质体利多卡因与更高的静脉置管成功率、更少的疼痛、更短的总操作时间和轻微的皮肤变化相关。只要可行,应考虑将其常规用于痛苦的皮肤操作。