Suppr超能文献

比较全科医生记录与患者自我报告问卷以估算成本。

Comparison of general practitioner records and patient self-report questionnaires for estimation of costs.

作者信息

Mistry Hema, Buxton Martin, Longworth Louise, Chatwin Judy, Peveler Robert

机构信息

Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2005 Sep;6(3):261-6. doi: 10.1007/s10198-005-0300-7.

Abstract

This study compared resource use data and estimated costs over a 12-month period, based on patient self-report questionnaires and general practitioner records. The level of agreement was measured by weighted kappa. Differences in total costs were plotted against mean total costs. Of 324 patients with complete GP records for the period only 85 (26.2%) had complete self-report data. The recorded number of contacts per patient was higher for patient questionnaires than GP records (17.20 vs. 12.64), and the level of agreement between the two sources was moderate (kappa(w)=0.465). The plots of differences in total costs showed a slight downward bias, suggesting that estimation of total cost from GP records is lower than patient questionnaires. The incompleteness of patient questionnaires forces reliance on GP records as the main source of information for economic evaluations.

摘要

本研究基于患者自我报告问卷和全科医生记录,比较了12个月期间的资源使用数据和估计成本。一致性水平通过加权kappa进行测量。将总成本差异与平均总成本进行了绘图。在该期间有完整全科医生记录的324名患者中,只有85名(26.2%)有完整的自我报告数据。患者问卷记录的每位患者的接触次数高于全科医生记录(17.20对12.64),且两种来源之间的一致性水平为中等(kappa(w)=0.465)。总成本差异图显示出轻微的向下偏差,表明根据全科医生记录估计的总成本低于患者问卷。患者问卷的不完整性迫使我们依赖全科医生记录作为经济评估的主要信息来源。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验