Woods Robert T, Bruce Errollyn, Edwards Rhiannon T, Hounsome Barry, Keady John, Moniz-Cook Esme D, Orrell Martin, Russell Ian T
Dementia Services Development Centre Wales, Institute of Medical and Social Care Research, Bangor University, Normal Site, Holyhead Road, Bangor, UK.
Trials. 2009 Jul 30;10:64. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-64.
The growing number of people with dementia, and the increasing cost of care, provides a major incentive to develop and test methods of supporting them in the community for longer. Most attention has been given to pharmacological interventions, but there is increasing recognition that psychosocial interventions may be equally effective, even preferable where medication has negative side-effects. Reminiscence groups, run by professionals and volunteers, which use photographs, recordings and other objects to trigger personal memories are probably the most popular therapeutic approach to working with people with dementia, but there is little evidence for their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. The recent inclusion of family carers in groups with people with dementia, notably in our own pilot studies, has generated informal evidence that this joint approach improves relationships between people with dementia and their carers, and benefits both.
This multi-centre, pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of joint reminiscence groups for people with dementia and their family care-givers has two parallel arms--an intervention group and a control group who receive care as usual. The intervention consists of joint reminiscence groups held weekly for twelve consecutive weeks, followed by monthly maintenance sessions for a further seven months.The primary outcome measures are the quality of life of people with dementia, as assessed by QoL-AD, and their care-givers' mental health as assessed by the GHQ-28. Secondary outcomes include: the autobiographical memories of people with dementia; the quality of the relationship between them and their care-givers; and the levels of depression and anxiety felt by them and their care-giver. Using a 5% significance level, comparison of 200 pairs attending joint reminiscence groups with 200 pairs receiving usual treatment will yield 80% power to detect a standardised difference of 0.38 in the QoL-AD rated by the person with dementia and 0.28 in the GHQ-28 or carer-rated QoL-AD. The trial will include a cost-effectiveness analysis from a public sector perspective.
Our Cochrane review (2005) on reminiscence therapy for people with dementia did not identify any rigorous trials or economic analyses in this field.
ISRCTN42430123.
痴呆症患者人数不断增加,护理成本日益上升,这为开发和测试在社区中长期支持他们的方法提供了主要动力。人们大多关注药物干预,但越来越多的人认识到心理社会干预可能同样有效,在药物有负面副作用的情况下甚至更可取。由专业人员和志愿者组织的怀旧小组,利用照片、录音和其他物品来唤起个人记忆,可能是与痴呆症患者合作最受欢迎的治疗方法,但几乎没有证据证明其有效性和成本效益。最近,在痴呆症患者小组中纳入家庭照顾者,特别是在我们自己的试点研究中,产生了非正式证据,表明这种联合方法改善了痴呆症患者与其照顾者之间的关系,并使双方都受益。
这项多中心、实用的随机对照试验(RCT)旨在评估针对痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者的联合怀旧小组的有效性和成本效益,有两个平行组——干预组和接受常规护理的对照组。干预措施包括连续十二周每周举行一次联合怀旧小组活动,随后在接下来的七个月每月举行一次维持会议。主要结局指标是通过QoL - AD评估的痴呆症患者的生活质量,以及通过GHQ - 28评估的他们的照顾者的心理健康状况。次要结局包括:痴呆症患者的自传体记忆;他们与照顾者之间关系的质量;以及他们和照顾者感受到的抑郁和焦虑程度。使用5%的显著性水平,将200对参加联合怀旧小组的人与200对接受常规治疗的人进行比较,将有80%的把握检测出痴呆症患者在QoL - AD评分中0.38的标准化差异以及在GHQ - 28或照顾者评定的QoL - AD中0.28的标准化差异。该试验将从公共部门的角度进行成本效益分析。
我们2005年关于痴呆症患者怀旧疗法的Cochrane综述未发现该领域有任何严格的试验或经济分析。
ISRCTN42430123。