Suppr超能文献

为糖尿病患者提供护理的急症护理护士的针刺伤:一项回顾性研究。

Needlestick injury in acute care nurses caring for patients with diabetes mellitus: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Lee Jennifer M, Botteman Marc F, Nicklasson Lars, Cobden David, Pashos Chris L

机构信息

HERQuLES-Abt Associates Inc., Lexington, MA 02421, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 May;21(5):741-7. doi: 10.1185/030079905X46205.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the incidence and assess the risk of needlestick injury (NI) in nurses caring for patients with diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

A total of 400 nurses caring for patients with diabetes in 381 different hospitals throughout the United States over a period of at least 1 year voluntarily completed an Internet-based data collection instrument. The nurses self-reported comprehensive data on their experience with NI, focusing on those occurring within the past year. If respondents experienced multiple NI during this period, detailed data were collected on the most recent event.

RESULTS

Of the 400 nurses, 313 (78.3%) reported experiencing at least one NI, 110 (27.5%) reported at least one NI within the last 12 months, and 44 (40% of 110) reported multiple NI. Nearly two-thirds of these injuries (n = 73/110; 66.4%) were punctures that drew blood, resulting in one case of contracted hepatitis C. The cumulative annual incidence of NI events was 448 NI per 1000 nurses. Nurses reported the injury in adherence with existing regulations and policies in only 21.8% of the cases. Disposable syringes were involved in 88 (80%) of the NI events. In half of the injuries (n = 55), the needled device was equipped with a safety feature that was ineffective, primarily because it was not fully activated (n = 47/55; 85.5%) or it malfunctioned (n = 2-5; 3.6-9.1%). NI most commonly occurred while nurses were injecting insulin (n = 33; 30%). In the 2 weeks following their NI, 60.1% of nurses noted that they were more afraid of needled devices than before the injury and 41.8% felt anxious, depressed, or stressed. As a direct result of the NI, nurses missed 77 days of work.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to show the relatively high risk both of NI and of NI that draws blood among nurses injecting insulin with a disposable syringe and confirms previous incidence estimates of NI among nurses. Additionally, this study reveals significant post-NI emotional distress, suggests significant under-reporting of NI to hospital officials, and demonstrates the need for a more effective needle safety device.

摘要

目的

量化护理糖尿病患者的护士中针刺伤(NI)的发生率并评估其风险。

方法

在美国381家不同医院中,共有400名护理糖尿病患者至少1年的护士自愿完成了基于网络的数据收集工具。护士自行报告其针刺伤经历的综合数据,重点关注过去一年中发生的针刺伤。如果受访者在此期间经历了多次针刺伤,则收集最近一次事件的详细数据。

结果

在400名护士中,313名(78.3%)报告至少经历过一次针刺伤,110名(27.5%)报告在过去12个月内至少经历过一次针刺伤,44名(110名中的40%)报告经历过多次针刺伤。这些损伤中近三分之二(n = 73/110;66.4%)是导致出血的穿刺伤,导致1例丙型肝炎感染。针刺伤事件的累计年发生率为每1000名护士448次针刺伤。护士仅在21.8%的病例中按照现有法规和政策报告了损伤情况。88次(80%)针刺伤事件涉及一次性注射器。在一半的损伤事件(n = 55)中,带针装置配备了安全功能,但未起作用,主要原因是未完全激活(n = 47/55;85.5%)或发生故障(n = 2 - 5;3.6 - 9.1%)。针刺伤最常发生在护士注射胰岛素时(n = 33;30%)。在针刺伤后的2周内,60.1%的护士表示他们比受伤前更害怕带针装置,41.8%的护士感到焦虑、抑郁或有压力。由于针刺伤,护士共缺勤77天。

结论

本研究首次表明,使用一次性注射器注射胰岛素的护士中针刺伤以及导致出血的针刺伤风险相对较高,并证实了此前对护士针刺伤发生率的估计。此外,本研究揭示了针刺伤后严重的情绪困扰,表明向医院管理人员报告针刺伤的情况严重不足,并证明需要更有效的针头安全装置。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验