Suppr超能文献

美国重症监护病房的描述性分析。

Descriptive analysis of critical care units in the United States.

作者信息

Groeger J S, Strosberg M A, Halpern N A, Raphaely R C, Kaye W E, Guntupalli K K, Bertram D L, Greenbaum D M, Clemmer T P, Gallagher T J

机构信息

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):846-63. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199206000-00024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To gather data about available technology, staffing, administrative policies, and bed capacities of ICUs in the United States.

DESIGN AND SETTING

On January 15, 1991, survey instruments were mailed to the administrators of 4,233 hospitals to gather information from the medical director of the institutions' respective ICUs for the purpose of developing a database on ICUs in the United States. The sampling frame for this study was based on all American Hospital Association (AHA) hospitals that stated they have ICUs.

MEASUREMENTS

Census questionnaires solicited information on types of hospitals, types of ICUs, number of ICU beds open and closed, technology available to the unit, organizational structure and management of the ICU, as well as the staffing and certification of unit personnel.

MAIN RESULTS

Data were obtained on 32,850 ICU beds with 25,871 patients from 2,876 separate ICUs in 1,706 hospitals in the United States. Census responses came from units in all sizes of hospitals within all ten census regions in the country, all states, and all types of hospital sponsorship (federal, state, and local government, private nonprofit and private for profit). The census response rate was 40% of the AHA hospitals that stated that they have ICUs, with specific ICU data on 38.7% of the nation's ICUs. The number of ICUs per hospital increases with overall hospital size. The smallest hospitals (less than 100 beds) usually had only one ICU. As hospital size increased, the single, all inclusive medical/surgical/coronary care units diminished, and in hospitals with greater than 300 beds, specialization of units became prevalent. In absolute terms, hospitals had the following number of ICUs: 1.04 +/- 0.20 (less than or equal to 100 beds); 1.30 +/- 0.65 (101 to 300 beds); 2.37 +/- 1.58 (301 to 500 beds); and 3.34 +/- 2.21 (greater than 500 beds). ICU beds averaged, nationally, 8.09% of hospital-licensed beds with a median of 6.98%. Generally, medical units, pediatric units, coronary care units (CCUs), and medical/surgical/CCUs reported an average of 10 beds per unit. Neonatal units averaged 21 beds, and surgical units averaged 12 beds. The average ICU size, nationally, was 11.7 +/- 7.8 beds per unit. Available technology within hospitals and individual units was increased as hospital size increased; surgical units tended to have more available technology than other unit types. A wide range of organizational arrangements within hospitals determines where the ICU appears in an organizational chart and to whom unit management is accountable. Thirty-six percent of the units were located organizationally within the hospital's department of medicine, while 23% were considered "free standing," having no departmental affiliation. Although units must have a medical director, the perception as to whether this director supervises the day-to-day operation was different in larger vs. smaller hospitals. In hospitals with less than or equal to 100 beds, 72% of the units were perceived to be supervised by the medical director, whereas in larger hospitals (greater than 500 beds), 81% of units were supervised. Study results indicated that medical directors in pediatric, neonatal, and burn units most often were perceived to supervise the unit. Presently, 63% of all ICUs responding are directed by an internist. The next largest group to direct ICUs were surgeons, followed by pediatricians. Pediatrician involvement tended to be exclusive in pediatric and neonatal units. Surgeons directed most surgical and neurologic units and were involved in 21% of mixed medical/surgical units. Internists predominated in medical units and in CCUs, as well as in combined medical/surgical/CCUs. Direction by anesthesiologists, although relatively infrequent, predominated in the surgical unit. Critical care medicine certification of the medical director and attending staff of the ICU increased as hospital size increased, although only 44% of all units stated that thei

摘要

目的

收集有关美国重症监护病房(ICU)现有技术、人员配备、管理政策及床位容量的数据。

设计与设置

1991年1月15日,调查问卷被邮寄给4233家医院的管理人员,以便从各机构相应ICU的医疗主任处收集信息,目的是建立一个关于美国ICU的数据库。本研究的抽样框架基于所有声明设有ICU的美国医院协会(AHA)医院。

测量

普查问卷征集了有关医院类型、ICU类型、开放和关闭的ICU床位数、该科室可用技术、ICU的组织结构和管理,以及科室人员配备和资质认证等信息。

主要结果

从美国1706家医院的2876个独立ICU中的32850张ICU床位以及25871名患者处获得了数据。普查回复来自该国所有十个普查区域内各种规模医院的科室,涵盖所有州以及所有类型的医院赞助方(联邦、州和地方政府、私人非营利性和私人营利性)。普查回复率为声明设有ICU的AHA医院的40%,获得了全国38.7%的ICU的具体数据。每家医院的ICU数量随医院总体规模的增加而增加。规模最小的医院(床位少于100张)通常只有一个ICU。随着医院规模的增大,单一的、涵盖所有科室的内科/外科/冠心病监护病房逐渐减少,在床位多于300张的医院中,科室专业化变得普遍。就绝对数量而言,不同规模医院的ICU数量如下:1.04±0.20(床位少于或等于100张);1.30±0.65(101至300张床位);2.37±1.58(301至500张床位);3.34±2.21(多于500张床位)。全国范围内,ICU床位平均占医院许可床位的8.09%,中位数为6.98%。一般来说,内科病房、儿科病房、冠心病监护病房(CCU)以及内科/外科/CCU平均每个科室有10张床位。新生儿病房平均有21张床位,外科病房平均有12张床位。全国范围内,每个ICU的平均规模为11.7±7.8张床位。医院和各个科室的可用技术随着医院规模的增加而增多;外科科室往往比其他科室类型拥有更多的可用技术。医院内部广泛的组织安排决定了ICU在组织结构图中的位置以及科室管理对谁负责。36%的科室在组织架构上隶属于医院的内科,而23%被视为“独立科室”,无科室归属。尽管科室必须有一名医疗主任,但大医院和小医院对该主任是否监督日常运营的看法有所不同。在床位少于或等于100张的医院中,72%的科室被认为由医疗主任监督,而在大医院(多于500张床位)中,81%的科室受到监督。研究结果表明,儿科、新生儿和烧伤病房的医疗主任最常被认为负责监督科室。目前,所有回复的ICU中63%由内科医生指导。其次是外科医生指导的ICU数量较多,然后是儿科医生。儿科医生的参与往往仅限于儿科和新生儿病房。外科医生指导大多数外科和神经科病房,并参与了21%的内科/外科混合病房的指导工作。内科医生在内科病房、CCU以及内科/外科/CCU联合病房中占主导地位。麻醉医生的指导虽然相对较少,但在外科病房中占主导地位。随着医院规模的增加,ICU医疗主任和主治医护人员的重症医学认证有所增加,尽管只有44%的科室表示他们的……

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验