• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房患者中基于炎症的预后标志物与死亡率之间的关联

Association between Inflammation-Based Prognostic Markers and Mortality in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units.

作者信息

Oh Ah Ran, Ryu Jeong-Am, Lee Seung Joo, Kim Chung Su, Lee Sangmin Maria

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 6;14(16):1709. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161709.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14161709
PMID:39202197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11354181/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared the prognostic value of the C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in an intensive care unit (ICUs).

METHODS

This study used the data of 53,877 adult patients admitted to an ICU between June 2013 and May 2022. Using the CAR, NLR, and mGPS values, as well as the SOFA score from the ICU, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis and used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to compare the predictive value for 28-day and 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 2419 patients (4.5%) died within 28 days, and 6209 (11.5%) patients died within 1 year. After an adjustment, all predictors were found to be independent risk factors for 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-1.33, < 0.001 for the SOFA score; OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07, < 0.001 for CAR; OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, < 0.001 for the NLR; and OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.30, < 0.001 for the mGPS). This trend persisted for the 1-year mortality. In ROC curve analysis, the CAR showed better predictability than the NLR and mGPS. Furthermore, the predictive power of the CAR was significantly higher than that of the SOFA score for 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAR, NLR, and mGPS values at ICU admission were independent risk factors of mortality after ICU admission. The predictive value of CAR was higher than that of the SOFA score for 1-year mortality. CAR assessment at ICU admission may be a feasible predictor of long-term mortality.

摘要

背景

我们在重症监护病房(ICU)中比较了C反应蛋白(CRP)与白蛋白比值(CAR)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)与序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的预后价值。

方法

本研究使用了2013年6月至2022年5月期间入住ICU的53877例成年患者的数据。利用CAR、NLR和mGPS值以及ICU的SOFA评分,我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,并使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较了对28天和1年死亡率的预测价值。

结果

共有2419例患者(4.5%)在28天内死亡,6209例患者(11.5%)在1年内死亡。调整后,所有预测指标均被发现是28天死亡率的独立危险因素(SOFA评分的比值比[OR]为1.31,95%置信区间[CI]为1.29 - 1.33,P < 0.001;CAR的OR为1.05,95% CI为1.03 - 1.07,P < 0.001;NLR的OR为1.01,95% CI为1.00 - 1.02,P < 0.001;mGPS的OR为1.19,95% CI为1.08 - 1.30,P < 0.001)。这种趋势在1年死亡率中持续存在。在ROC曲线分析中,CAR显示出比NLR和mGPS更好的预测性。此外,对于1年死亡率,CAR的预测能力显著高于SOFA评分。

结论

ICU入院时的CAR、NLR和mGPS值是ICU入院后死亡率的独立危险因素。对于1年死亡率,CAR的预测价值高于SOFA评分。ICU入院时进行CAR评估可能是长期死亡率的可行预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f088/11354181/e46292305bb9/diagnostics-14-01709-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f088/11354181/76ab3203836c/diagnostics-14-01709-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f088/11354181/5d3c7668cf01/diagnostics-14-01709-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f088/11354181/e46292305bb9/diagnostics-14-01709-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f088/11354181/76ab3203836c/diagnostics-14-01709-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f088/11354181/5d3c7668cf01/diagnostics-14-01709-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f088/11354181/e46292305bb9/diagnostics-14-01709-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between Inflammation-Based Prognostic Markers and Mortality in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units.重症监护病房患者中基于炎症的预后标志物与死亡率之间的关联
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 6;14(16):1709. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161709.
2
[Combined prognostic value of serum lactic acid, procalcitonin and severity score for short-term prognosis of septic shock patients].[血清乳酸、降钙素原及严重程度评分对脓毒症休克患者短期预后的联合预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):281-285. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201113-00715.
3
Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin was a predictor from the day after intensive care unit entry, but not on the day of intensive care unit entry.尿中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白在进入重症监护病房的第二天即可作为预测指标,但在进入重症监护病房的当天则不行。
Clin Chim Acta. 2021 Jun;517:117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.02.017. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
4
[Clinical predictive value of short-term dynamic changes in platelet counts for prognosis of sepsis patients in intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study in adults].[血小板计数短期动态变化对重症监护病房脓毒症患者预后的临床预测价值:一项针对成人的回顾性队列研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Mar;32(3):301-306. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20190909-00069.
5
Development and Internal Validation of a New Prognostic Model Powered to Predict 28-Day All-Cause Mortality in ICU COVID-19 Patients-The COVID-SOFA Score.一种用于预测ICU中COVID-19患者28天全因死亡率的新预后模型——COVID-SOFA评分的开发与内部验证
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 18;11(14):4160. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144160.
6
[Prognostic value of Charlson weighted index of comorbidities combined with sequential organ failure assessment score and procalcitonin in patients with sepsis].[脓毒症患者中Charlson合并症加权指数联合序贯器官衰竭评估评分及降钙素原的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Nov;31(11):1335-1339. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.11.005.
7
[Prognosis analysis of multi-indicator combined with sequential organ failure assessment in patients with sepsis].[多指标联合序贯器官衰竭评估对脓毒症患者的预后分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Dec;35(12):1245-1249. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230617-00453.
8
Association between inflammation-based prognostic markers and mortality of non-cardiac surgery.炎症标志物与非心脏手术死亡率的关系。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2023 Dec;76(6):550-558. doi: 10.4097/kja.23068. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
9
[Effect of hypophosphatemia on the prognosis of critically ill patients].[低磷血症对危重症患者预后的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Aug;34(8):858-862. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220601-00547.
10
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分预测越南重症监护病房脓毒症患者死亡率:一项多中心、横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 14;13(3):e064870. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064870.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between sarcopenia (defined by low muscle mass), inflammatory markers, and all-cause mortality in older adults: mediation analyses in a large U.S. NHANES community sample, 1999-2006.肌肉减少症(以低肌肉量定义)、炎症标志物与老年人全因死亡率之间的关联:对1999 - 2006年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)大型社区样本的中介分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 10;12:1515839. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1515839. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Is a Promising Predictor of Mortality and Admission to Intensive Care Unit of COVID-19 Patients.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)是COVID-19患者死亡率和入住重症监护病房的一个有前景的预测指标。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 16;11(8):2235. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082235.
2
Inflammatory biomarkers as independent prognosticators of 28-day mortality for COVID-19 patients admitted to general medicine or ICU wards: a retrospective cohort study.炎症生物标志物作为普通内科或 ICU 病房收治的 COVID-19 患者 28 天死亡率的独立预后因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;16(6):1573-1582. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02637-8. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
3
Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts 30 day postoperative morbidity and survival after primary surgery for ovarian cancer.
术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可预测卵巢癌初次手术后 30 天术后发病率和生存率。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1378-1383. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001378. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
Preoperative Neutrophil and Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Mortality and Morbidity After Cardiac Surgery.术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可预测心脏手术后的死亡率和发病率。
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Mar;30(3):414-418. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.05.115. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
5
Prognostic values of SOFA score, qSOFA score, and LODS score for patients with sepsis.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分和逻辑器官功能障碍评分(LODS)对脓毒症患者的预后价值。
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 May;9(3):1037-1044. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-984.
6
The prevalence of cancer associated systemic inflammation: Implications of prognostic studies using the Glasgow Prognostic Score.癌症相关全身炎症的流行:使用格拉斯哥预后评分的预后研究的意义。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020 Jun;150:102962. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102962. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
7
The SOFA score-development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials.SOFA 评分的发展、在临床试验中准确评估的效用和挑战。
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 27;23(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2663-7.
8
The use of APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS 3, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, and lactate to predict mortality of surgical critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study.使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、简化急性生理学评分系统3(SAPS 3)、C反应蛋白/白蛋白比值及乳酸来预测外科危重症患者的死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(26):e16204. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016204.
9
Clinical usefulness of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in predicting 30-day mortality in critically ill patients: A retrospective analysis.C 反应蛋白与白蛋白比值对危重症患者 30 天死亡率的预测作用:一项回顾性分析。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 8;8(1):14977. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33361-7.
10
Novel Mortality Markers for Critically Ill Patients.危重症患者的新型死亡标志物。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):383-385. doi: 10.1177/0885066617753389. Epub 2018 Jan 15.