Woolhead Gillian, Tadd Win, Boix-Ferrer Josep Antoni, Krajcik Stefan, Schmid-Pfahler Barbara, Spjuth Barbro, Stratton David, Dieppe Paul
MRC Health Services Research Collaboration, Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK.
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):363-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.014. Epub 2005 Jun 20.
To examine the experiences of communication between older people and health and social care providers in six European countries.
Focus groups were carried out with groups of older people (91 focus groups, 391 participants), and health and social care professionals (85 focus groups, 424 participants), in order to gain insights into concepts of good communications. Data collection and analysis continued concurrently according to the method of constant comparison.
Different styles of communication between professionals and older people were found to be capable of enhancing or jeopardising dignity. The use of appropriate forms of address, listening, giving people choice, including them, respecting their need for privacy and politeness, and making them feel valued emerged as significant ways to maintain older peoples' sense of self-worth and dignity. Despite being aware of good communication practices, health and social care professionals often failed to implement them. Lack of time, staff, resource scarcity, regulation and bureaucracy were cited as barriers, as was a lack of awareness and effort.
The findings have important implications for health and social care professionals when they engage with older people.
考察六个欧洲国家中老年人与健康及社会护理提供者之间的沟通体验。
针对老年人群体(91个焦点小组,391名参与者)以及健康和社会护理专业人员(85个焦点小组,424名参与者)开展焦点小组讨论,以深入了解良好沟通的概念。根据持续比较法,数据收集与分析同步进行。
发现专业人员与老年人之间不同的沟通方式可能增强或损害尊严。使用恰当的称呼形式、倾听、给予人们选择、让他们参与其中、尊重他们对隐私和礼貌的需求,以及让他们感到受重视,这些成为维护老年人自我价值感和尊严的重要方式。尽管健康和社会护理专业人员了解良好的沟通做法,但他们往往未能予以实施。时间不足、人员短缺、资源匮乏、规章制度和官僚作风被视为障碍,缺乏意识和努力也是如此。
这些发现对健康和社会护理专业人员与老年人打交道具有重要意义。