Suppr超能文献

用12种抗菌剂对放线菌属进行药敏试验。

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Actinomyces species with 12 antimicrobial agents.

作者信息

Smith A J, Hall V, Thakker B, Gemmell C G

机构信息

Infection Research Group, Glasgow Dental Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Aug;56(2):407-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki206. Epub 2005 Jun 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to assess the susceptibility of human clinical isolates of Actinomyces species to 12 antimicrobial agents.

METHODS

Human clinical isolates of Actinomyces spp. were collected from stored collections held at the Microbiology Department, Edinburgh University, Anaerobe Reference Laboratory, Cardiff, Glasgow Dental Hospital and Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Each isolate was identified by restriction analysis of amplified 16S ribosomal DNA. MICs of 12 antibiotics comprising benzyl penicillin, amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, linezolid, tetracycline, deoxycycline, clindamycin, erythromycin, clarithromycin, ciprofloxacin, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam for 87 strains of Actinomyces species were obtained by Etest methodology.

RESULTS

The Actinomyces species identified for this study comprised: Actinomyces israelii, Actinomyces gerencseriae, Actinomyces turicensis, Actinomyces funkei, Actinomyces graevenitzii and Actinomyces europaeus. All isolates were susceptible to penicillin and amoxicillin. All but one strain of A. turicensis was susceptible to linezolid. A number of A. europaeus and A. graevenitzii isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone and piperacillin/tazobactam. A number of isolates of A. turicensis and A. europaeus also demonstrated resistance to erythromycin. All Actinomyces species tested appeared resistant to ciprofloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

Actinomyces species appear to be susceptible to a wide range of beta-lactam agents and these, when combined with beta-lactamase inhibitors, should be regarded as agents of first choice. Ciprofloxacin performed poorly. Tetracyclines also demonstrated poor performance. This is the first study of antimicrobial susceptibilities for a number of accurately identified clinical isolates of Actinomyces spp. There are a number of species differences in susceptibility profiles to the antimicrobials tested, suggesting that accurate identification and speciation may have an impact on clinical outcome.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估放线菌属人类临床分离株对12种抗菌药物的敏感性。

方法

从爱丁堡大学微生物学系、加的夫厌氧菌参考实验室、格拉斯哥牙科医院和格拉斯哥皇家医院保存的菌株库中收集放线菌属人类临床分离株。通过对扩增的16S核糖体DNA进行限制性分析来鉴定每一株分离菌。采用Etest法测定了87株放线菌属菌株对12种抗生素(包括苄青霉素、阿莫西林、头孢曲松、利奈唑胺、四环素、多西环素、克林霉素、红霉素、克拉霉素、环丙沙星、美罗培南和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦)的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。

结果

本研究鉴定出的放线菌属包括:衣氏放线菌、杰氏放线菌、图氏放线菌、芬氏放线菌、格氏放线菌和欧氏放线菌。所有分离株对青霉素和阿莫西林敏感。除1株图氏放线菌外,其余均对利奈唑胺敏感。一些欧氏放线菌和格氏放线菌分离株对头孢曲松和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦耐药。一些图氏放线菌和欧氏放线菌分离株也对红霉素耐药。所有测试的放线菌属菌株对环丙沙星均耐药。

结论

放线菌属似乎对多种β-内酰胺类药物敏感,当与β-内酰胺酶抑制剂联合使用时,应被视为首选药物。环丙沙星效果不佳。四环素类药物效果也较差。这是首次对多种准确鉴定的放线菌属临床分离株进行抗菌药敏研究。在对所测试抗菌药物的敏感性方面存在一些种间差异,这表明准确鉴定和分类可能会对临床结果产生影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验