Richards J D, Sanchez-Ballester J, Jones R K, Darke N, Livingstone B N
Faculty of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jul;87(7):937-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.16005.
In this cross-over study, we evaluated two types of knee brace commonly used in the conservative treatment of osteoarthritis of the medial compartment. Twelve patients confirmed radiologically as having unilateral osteoarthritis of the medial compartment (Larsen grade 2 to grade 4) were studied. Treatment with a simple hinged brace was compared with that using a valgus corrective brace. Knee kinematics, ground reaction forces, pain and function were assessed during walking and the Hospital for Special Surgery scores were also determined. Significant improvements in pain, function, and loading and propulsive forces were seen with the valgus brace. Treatment with a simple brace showed only significant improvements in loading forces. Our findings suggest that although both braces improved confidence and function during gait, the valgus brace showed greater benefit.
在这项交叉研究中,我们评估了两种常用于内侧间室骨关节炎保守治疗的膝关节支具。研究了12例经放射学确诊为单侧内侧间室骨关节炎(拉森分级2至4级)的患者。将简单铰链式支具的治疗效果与外翻矫正支具的治疗效果进行了比较。在步行过程中评估了膝关节运动学、地面反作用力、疼痛和功能,并确定了特殊外科医院评分。外翻支具在疼痛、功能、负重和推进力方面有显著改善。简单支具治疗仅在负重方面有显著改善。我们的研究结果表明,虽然两种支具都提高了步态中的信心和功能,但外翻支具的益处更大。