Yoon Yoo-Seok, Kim Sun-Whe, Park Sang Jae, Lee Hye Seung, Jang Jin-Young, Choi Min Gew, Kim Woo Ho, Lee Kuhn-Uk, Park Yong-Hyun
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Surg. 2005 Jul;242(1):92-100. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000167853.04171.bb.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether ampullectomy can substitute for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in early ampullary cancer by clinicopathologic study.
Although ampullectomy has been attempted in early ampullary cancer (pTis, pT1), the indication and extent of resection have not been established.
Of 201 patients who had undergone PD for ampullary cancer between 1986 and 2002, 67 patients with a histologic diagnosis of pTis (n = 5) or pT1 (n = 62) cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Pathologic PD specimens were reviewed to analyze the cancer spread pattern, and medical records were reviewed for clinical outcomes.
The 5-year survival rate of the 66 patients with early ampullary cancer (excluding one mortality) was 83.7%. Recurrence was confirmed in 12 patients (18.2%) and all died because of the recurrence. Pathologic review showed that 22 patients (32.8%) had at least one risk factor for failure after ampullectomy: lymph node metastasis (n = 6, 9.0%), perineural invasion (n = 1), or mucosal tumor infiltration along the CBD or P-duct (n = 15, 22.4%). Mean lengths of invasion into the CBD or the P-duct beyond the sphincter of Oddi were 7.7 mm (range, 1-25 mm) or 6.3 mm (range, 2-18 mm), respectively. Moreover, these risk factors were not correlated with tumor size, histologic grade, or the gross morphology of the primary tumor, although pTis cancer or pT1 cancer sized 1.0 cm or less was found to be least associated with risk factors.
Ampullectomy for early ampullary cancer should not be considered an alternative operation to PD because of the high possibility of recurrence. PD should be preferably performed for adequate radical resection, even in early ampullary cancer, and ampullectomy should be reserved for those who have pTis or pT1 cancer sized 1.0 cm or less with high operative risk.
本研究旨在通过临床病理研究评估壶腹癌根治性切除术是否可替代早期壶腹癌的胰十二指肠切除术(PD)。
尽管已尝试对早期壶腹癌(pTis、pT1)进行壶腹癌根治性切除术,但切除的指征和范围尚未确定。
回顾性分析1986年至2002年间因壶腹癌接受PD手术的201例患者,其中67例经组织学诊断为pTis(n = 5)或pT1(n = 62)癌的患者。对病理PD标本进行复查以分析癌症扩散模式,并查阅病历以了解临床结局。
66例早期壶腹癌患者(不包括1例死亡患者)的5年生存率为83.7%。12例患者(18.2%)确诊复发,均因复发死亡。病理复查显示,22例患者(32.8%)至少有一项壶腹癌根治性切除术后失败的危险因素:淋巴结转移(n = 6,9.0%)、神经周围浸润(n = 1)或沿胆总管或胰管的黏膜肿瘤浸润(n = 15,22.4%)。超出Oddi括约肌进入胆总管或胰管的平均浸润长度分别为7.7 mm(范围1 - 25 mm)或6.3 mm(范围2 - 18 mm)。此外,这些危险因素与肿瘤大小、组织学分级或原发肿瘤的大体形态无关,尽管发现直径1.0 cm或更小的pTis癌或pT1癌与危险因素的关联最小。
由于复发可能性高,早期壶腹癌的壶腹癌根治性切除术不应被视为PD的替代手术。即使是早期壶腹癌,也应首选PD进行充分的根治性切除,壶腹癌根治性切除术应保留给那些患有直径1.0 cm或更小的pTis或pT1癌且手术风险高的患者。