van Gulik T M, Gerhards M, de Vries J, van Geenen R, de Wit L T, Obertop H, Gouma D J
Dept. of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ann Oncol. 1999;10 Suppl 4:243-6.
Biliopancreatic tumors that are potentially amenable to local resection include proximal bile duct tumors (Klatskin tumors), mid-choledochal duct tumors and tumors arising from the papilla of Vater. This paper reviews our experience in the AMC, with local resection of these conditions. From 1983-1997, 112 patients underwent surgical resection of a carcinoma of the hepatic duct confluence (Klatskin tumor). Local resection was undertaken in 80 patients (52 patients with type I and II tumors, and 28 patients with type III tumors) whereas in 32 patients with type III tumors, hilar resection was performed with liver resection. Negative surgical margins were achieved in 10 patients after local resection of type I and II tumors (19.2%), in 1 patient after local resection of a type III tumor (3.6%), and in 5 patients after hilar resection and liver resection (15.6%). Middle-third carcinomas of the extra-hepatic biliary tract are less common than proximal or distal bile duct tumors. From 1993-1998, 12 patients underwent resection of a mid-choledochal duct carcinoma. In 8 patients, local resection was performed and in 4 patients, subtotal pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) because of the close relationship of the tumor and the pancreas. Four patients had negative surgical margins, 2 after local resection (25%) and 2 after PPPD (50%). Although accepted for villous adenomas located in the ampulla, local resection for ampullary carcinoma is controversial. Nine patients underwent local resection of a presumed adenoma that proved to be an ampullary carcinoma. In 4 patients with T1 tumors, resection of the carcinoma was locally complete (44%). Additional PPPD was performed in 6 patients, including the 4 patients with complete local resections, showing no residual tumor at the previous site of excision, but, lymphnode metastases in two resection specimens (both of patients with presumed T1 tumors). Hence, local resection of a T1 ampullary carcinoma might result in tumor free margins, but does not deal with (usually retropancreatic) lymphnode metastases. In conclusion, local resection is applicable to Klatskin type I and II tumors. Local resection may be considered in the proximally located, mid-choledochal duct carcinomas but, when located closer to the pancreas, PPPD is the preferred treatment. For ampullary adenomas, local resection is feasible unless frozen section examination raises suspicion on a malignancy. Local resection of even limited ampullary carcinomas is not advisable because of lymphatic dissemination of the tumor and consequently, inadequate clearance.
有可能适合局部切除的胆胰肿瘤包括近端胆管肿瘤(克氏壶腹肿瘤)、胆总管中段肿瘤以及起源于 Vater 壶腹的肿瘤。本文回顾了我们在 AMC 对这些病症进行局部切除的经验。1983 年至 1997 年,112 例患者接受了肝管汇合部癌(克氏壶腹肿瘤)的手术切除。80 例患者进行了局部切除(52 例 I 型和 II 型肿瘤患者,28 例 III 型肿瘤患者),而 32 例 III 型肿瘤患者进行了肝门切除并联合肝切除。I 型和 II 型肿瘤局部切除术后 10 例患者切缘阴性(19.2%),III 型肿瘤局部切除术后 1 例患者切缘阴性(3.6%),肝门切除并联合肝切除术后 5 例患者切缘阴性(15.6%)。肝外胆管中段癌比近端或远端胆管肿瘤少见。1993 年至 1998 年,12 例患者接受了胆总管中段癌切除。8 例患者进行了局部切除,4 例患者因肿瘤与胰腺关系密切而进行了胰十二指肠次全切除术(PPPD)。4 例患者切缘阴性,2 例在局部切除后(25%),2 例在 PPPD 后(50%)。虽然对于位于壶腹的绒毛状腺瘤可接受局部切除,但壶腹癌的局部切除存在争议。9 例患者对疑似腺瘤进行了局部切除,结果证实为壶腹癌。4 例 T1 期肿瘤患者,癌的局部切除完整(44%)。6 例患者进行了额外的 PPPD,包括 4 例局部切除完整的患者,这些患者在先前切除部位未发现残留肿瘤,但在两个切除标本中有淋巴结转移(均为疑似 T1 期肿瘤患者)。因此,T1 期壶腹癌的局部切除可能获得切缘无肿瘤,但无法处理(通常为胰后)淋巴结转移。总之,局部切除适用于克氏 I 型和 II 型肿瘤。对于近端胆总管中段癌,可考虑局部切除,但当肿瘤位置更靠近胰腺时,PPPD 是首选治疗方法。对于壶腹腺瘤,除非冰冻切片检查怀疑为恶性,局部切除是可行的。即使是有限的壶腹癌,由于肿瘤的淋巴扩散以及因此导致的清除不充分,也不建议进行局部切除。