Pichora-Fuller M K, Schneider B A
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Apr;91(4 Pt 1):2129-35. doi: 10.1121/1.403673.
Diotic (SoNo) thresholds and dichotic (S pi N pi tau) thresholds were measured for young and old adults using a 500-Hz pure-tone signal and broadband burst masking noise at 37 dB SPL/Hz. In the dichotic condition both the signal and the masker were phase reversed and the masker was presented with an interaural delay of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 3, or 5 ms. Masking-level differences (MLDs) were determined by subtracting dichotic thresholds from diotic thresholds. The SoNo thresholds for the old subjects did not differ significantly from those for the young subjects; however, when MLDs were plotted as a function of delay, the pattern of results differed significantly between young and old subjects. This difference in pattern was completely accounted for in terms of a delay-line version of Durlach's equalization and cancellation (EC) model [N. I. Durlach, in Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory, edited by J. V. Tobias (Academic, New York, 1972); B. A. Schneider and P. M. Zurek, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 1756-1763 (1989)] by assuming that temporal jitter increases with internal delay in young subjects but that it does not vary with the amount of internal delay in old subjects.
使用500赫兹纯音信号和37分贝声压级/赫兹的宽带猝发声掩蔽噪声,测量了年轻和老年成年人的双耳(SoNo)阈值和双耳分听(S pi N pi tau)阈值。在双耳分听条件下,信号和掩蔽声都进行了相位反转,并且掩蔽声以0.25、0.5、0.75、1、1.25、1.5、1.75、2、3或5毫秒的耳间延迟呈现。掩蔽级差(MLD)通过从双耳阈值中减去双耳分听阈值来确定。老年受试者的SoNo阈值与年轻受试者的阈值没有显著差异;然而,当将MLD作为延迟的函数进行绘制时,年轻和老年受试者的结果模式存在显著差异。根据Durlach的均衡与抵消(EC)模型的延迟线版本[N. I. Durlach,载于J. V. Tobias编辑的《现代听觉理论基础》(纽约学术出版社,1972年);B. A. Schneider和P. M. Zurek,《美国声学学会杂志》86,1756 - 1763(1989年)],通过假设年轻受试者的时间抖动随内部延迟增加,而老年受试者的时间抖动不随内部延迟量变化,这种模式差异得到了完全解释。