• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人的掩蔽级差异:反相和延时双耳分听条件的比较。

Masking-level differences in the elderly: a comparison of antiphasic and time-delay dichotic conditions.

作者信息

Pichora-Fuller M K, Schneider B A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Dec;34(6):1410-22. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3406.1410.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.3406.1410
PMID:1787722
Abstract

Four dichotic thresholds (S pi N0, S0 N pi, S0 N tau, and S pi N pi tau) were measured for young and old subjects using both burst and continuous broadband maskers. Masking-level differences (MLDs) were determined by subtracting dichotic thresholds from homophasic thresholds (S0 N0 or S pi N pi). The S0 N0 thresholds for the old subjects did not differ significantly from those for the young subjects in either the continuous or the burst masking noise conditions. The S pi N pi thresholds for the old subjects did not differ significantly from those for the young subjects in the continuous masking noise condition, but there was a significant age effect (3 dB) when burst masking noise was used. Both young and old subjects obtained larger MLDs in continuous masking noise than in burst masking noise. MLDs for old subjects were smaller than MLDs for young subjects by 4.3, 5.0, 2.7, and 1.6 dB in burst masking noise and by 4.9, 3.5, 2.5, and 1.4 dB in continuous masking noise, respectively in the S pi N0, S pi N pi tau, S0 N tau, and S0 N pi conditions. Four young subjects there was a hierarchy in the size of the MLD obtained in the four dichotic conditions, with the MLD being significantly larger in the S pi N0 and S pi N pi tau conditions; however, the size of the MLD was the same in all four conditions for the old subjects. Compared to young subjects, the performance of the old subjects was characterized by decreased ability to use homophasic cues in burst masking noise and decreased ability to use interaural difference cues. These findings were observed at four signal frequencies.

摘要

使用突发和连续宽带掩蔽器,测量了年轻和老年受试者的四个双耳阈值(SπN0、S0Nπ、S0Nτ和SπNπτ)。通过从同相阈值(S0N0或SπNπ)中减去双耳阈值来确定掩蔽级差(MLD)。在连续或突发掩蔽噪声条件下,老年受试者的S0N0阈值与年轻受试者的S0N0阈值没有显著差异。在连续掩蔽噪声条件下,老年受试者的SπNπ阈值与年轻受试者的SπNπ阈值没有显著差异,但在使用突发掩蔽噪声时,存在显著的年龄效应(3dB)。年轻和老年受试者在连续掩蔽噪声中获得的MLD都比在突发掩蔽噪声中更大。在突发掩蔽噪声中,老年受试者在SπN0、SπNπτ、S0Nτ和S0Nπ条件下的MLD分别比年轻受试者小4.3、5.0、2.7和1.6dB;在连续掩蔽噪声中,分别小4.9、3.5、2.5和1.4dB。对于四名年轻受试者,在四种双耳条件下获得的MLD大小存在层次结构,在SπN0和SπNπτ条件下MLD显著更大;然而,老年受试者在所有四种条件下的MLD大小相同。与年轻受试者相比,老年受试者的表现特点是在突发掩蔽噪声中使用同相线索的能力下降,以及使用双耳差异线索的能力下降。在四个信号频率上都观察到了这些结果。

相似文献

1
Masking-level differences in the elderly: a comparison of antiphasic and time-delay dichotic conditions.老年人的掩蔽级差异:反相和延时双耳分听条件的比较。
J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Dec;34(6):1410-22. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3406.1410.
2
The effect of interaural delay of the masker on masking-level differences in young and old adults.掩蔽声的双耳延迟对年轻人和老年人掩蔽级差的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Apr;91(4 Pt 1):2129-35. doi: 10.1121/1.403673.
3
Binaural modulation masking.双耳调制掩蔽
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Mar;89(3):1340-9. doi: 10.1121/1.400657.
4
Effects of noise bandwidth on the late-potential masking level difference.噪声带宽对晚电位掩蔽级差的影响。
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Mar-Apr;84(2):157-63. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90020-c.
5
Development of a 500-Hz masking-level difference protocol for clinic use.用于临床的500赫兹掩蔽级差协议的开发。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2003;14(1):1-8. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.14.1.2.
6
Masking level differences: auditory evoked responses with homophasic and antiphasic signal and noise.掩蔽级差异:同相和反相信号与噪声下的听觉诱发电位
J Speech Hear Res. 1979 Jun;22(2):403-11. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2202406.
7
Influence of masker bandwidth on binaural masking level differences.掩蔽声带宽对双耳掩蔽级差的影响。
Audiology. 1992;31(4):196-204. doi: 10.3109/00206099209081655.
8
The influence of signal duration, signal frequency and masker duration on binaural masking level differences.信号时长、信号频率及掩蔽声时长对双耳掩蔽级差的影响。
Hear Res. 1986;23(3):267-73. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90115-2.
9
The phase angle of addition in temporal masking for diotic and dichotic listening conditions.双耳和分听条件下时间掩蔽中的相加相位角。
Hear Res. 1982 Aug;7(3):247-59. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(82)90039-9.
10
Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure.使用带宽限制测量方法和一种改进的带宽限制测量方法,比较了双耳聆听和双声道聆听条件下的频率分辨率。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Mar;89(3):1331-9. doi: 10.1121/1.400537.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-Related Deficits in Binaural Hearing: Contribution of Peripheral and Central Effects.年龄相关的双耳听力障碍:外周和中枢效应的贡献。
J Neurosci. 2024 Apr 17;44(16):e0963222024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0963-22.2024.
2
Sound source localization patterns and bilateral cochlear implants: Age at onset of deafness effects.声源定位模式与双侧人工耳蜗植入:耳聋发病年龄的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 8;17(2):e0263516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263516. eCollection 2022.
3
Differences in Auditory Perception Between Young and Older Adults When Controlling for Differences in Hearing Loss and Cognition.
控制听力损失和认知差异后,年轻人和老年人在听觉感知上的差异。
Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165211066180. doi: 10.1177/23312165211066180.
4
Identification and Discrimination of Sound Textures in Hearing-Impaired and Older Listeners.听力受损和老年听众声音纹理的识别与区分。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211065608. doi: 10.1177/23312165211065608.
5
Impaired Binaural Hearing in Adults: A Selected Review of the Literature.成人双耳听力受损:文献综述精选
Front Neurosci. 2021 Mar 19;15:610957. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.610957. eCollection 2021.
6
Neural Representation Enhanced for Speech and Reduced for Background Noise With a Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Scheme During a Selective Attention Task.在选择性注意任务期间,通过助听器降噪方案增强语音的神经表征并减少背景噪声的神经表征。
Front Neurosci. 2020 Sep 10;14:846. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00846. eCollection 2020.
7
Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.正常听力和双侧人工耳蜗植入者处理两耳间时间和强度差的速度和年龄效应。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Nov;146(5):3232. doi: 10.1121/1.5130384.
8
Speech-in-noise representation in the aging midbrain and cortex: Effects of hearing loss.老化的中脑和大脑皮层中的噪声言语表征:听力损失的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 13;14(3):e0213899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213899. eCollection 2019.
9
The Association Between the Processing of Binaural Temporal-Fine-Structure Information and Audiometric Threshold and Age: A Meta-Analysis.双耳时间精细结构信息处理与听阈和年龄的关系:一项荟萃分析。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518797259. doi: 10.1177/2331216518797259.
10
Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.年龄相关的双耳掩蔽级差差异:行为和电生理证据。
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Dec 1;120(6):2939-2952. doi: 10.1152/jn.00255.2018. Epub 2018 Sep 19.