Aylward Lesa L, Lamb James C, Lewis Steven C
Exponent, Inc., Alexandria, Virginia 22314, USA.
Toxicol Sci. 2005 Sep;87(1):3-10. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfi236. Epub 2005 Jun 23.
Recent risk assessments for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related compounds have focused on adverse effects observed in rodent offspring exposed while in utero during critical gestational periods as among the most sensitive adverse effects attributable to TCDD exposure. In addition, these risk assessments have converged on the use of body concentration (or "body burden") of TCDD as a dose metric superior to administered dose for cross-species comparisons and risk assessments, due to the interspecies differences in elimination kinetics and substantial persistence of these compounds. The detailed, although incomplete, data that are available on maternal-fetal distribution of TCDD and related compounds illustrate differences in distribution among these compounds that impact assessments on a body-burden basis. These data also demonstrate differences in distribution after subchronic or chronic administration compared to acute administration. Some data are now also available addressing inconsistencies that may arise from the use of TCDD toxic equivalency factors (TEFs), which were derived on an administered-dose basis, in evaluating responses to mixtures of dioxins on a body-burden basis in the context of chronic exposure situations. Finally, the use of body burden as a dose metric does not account for or eliminate the substantial differences in sensitivity to dioxin observed across species or between different strains of the same species and, thus, does not eliminate the need to consider the relative sensitivity of humans compared to laboratory animal models in risk assessments. Additional research areas that may increase the foundation for interspecies extrapolations are discussed.
