Mannion Stephen, O'Callaghan Sheila, Walsh Mary, Murphy Damian B, Shorten George D
MRCPI, FCARCSI, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Anesth Analg. 2005 Jul;101(1):259-64, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000153866.38440.43.
We compared the approaches of Winnie and Capdevila for psoas compartment block (PCB) performed by a single operator in terms of contralateral spread, lumbar plexus blockade, and postoperative analgesic efficacy. Sixty patients underwent PCB (0.4 mL/kg levobupivacaine 0.5%) and subsequent spinal anesthesia for primary joint arthroplasty (hip or knee) in a prospective, double-blind study. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo PCB by using the Capdevila (group C; n = 30) or a modified Winnie (group W; n = 30) approach. Contralateral spread and lumbar plexus blockade were assessed 15, 30, and 45 min after PCB. Contralateral spread (bilateral from T4 to S5) and femoral and lateral cutaneous nerve block were evaluated by sensory testing, and obturator motor block was assessed. Bilateral anesthesia occurred in 10 patients in group C and 12 patients in group W (P = 0.8). Blockade of the femoral, lateral cutaneous, and obturator nerves was 90%, 93%, and 80%, respectively, for group C and 93%, 97%, and 90%, respectively, for group W (P > 0.05). No differences were found in PCB procedure time, pain scores, 24-h morphine consumption, or time to first morphine analgesia.
我们比较了由单一操作者采用温妮法和卡德维拉法进行腰大肌间隙阻滞(PCB)时,在对侧扩散、腰丛神经阻滞及术后镇痛效果方面的差异。在一项前瞻性双盲研究中,60例患者接受了PCB(0.4 mL/kg左旋布比卡因0.5%)及随后的用于初次关节置换术(髋关节或膝关节)的脊髓麻醉。患者被随机分配采用卡德维拉法(C组;n = 30)或改良温妮法(W组;n = 30)进行PCB。在PCB后15、30和45分钟评估对侧扩散和腰丛神经阻滞情况。通过感觉测试评估对侧扩散(从T4至S5双侧)以及股神经和股外侧皮神经阻滞情况,并评估闭孔神经运动阻滞情况。C组有10例患者出现双侧麻醉,W组有12例患者出现双侧麻醉(P = 0.8)。C组股神经、股外侧皮神经和闭孔神经的阻滞率分别为90%、93%和80%,W组分别为93%、97%和90%(P > 0.05)。在PCB操作时间、疼痛评分、24小时吗啡用量或首次使用吗啡镇痛的时间方面未发现差异。