Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换术后闭孔神经阻滞与股神经阻滞用于镇痛的比较

Obturator versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Kardash Ken, Hickey Don, Tessler Michael J, Payne Stacey, Zukor David, Velly Ana Miriam

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2007 Sep;105(3):853-8. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278158.36843.f7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both femoral and obturator nerve blocks have been suggested to be useful in relieving pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We sought to compare their efficacy.

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing elective unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia received in a randomized, double-blind manner a femoral, obturator, or sham nerve block at the end of surgery. Blocks were performed using nerve stimulation and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5% containing epinephrine 5 microg/mL. Patient-controlled IV analgesia with fentanyl, celecoxib 100 mg PO bid, and acetaminophen 650 mg PO every 6 h were started on arrival in the recovery room. Pain (0-10 numeric rating scale, NRS) at rest and with movement, analgesic use, and side effects were recorded for 48 h. Maximum knee flexion and total days in hospital were recorded as functional outcomes.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the obturator block group and the control group in any outcome variable. With baseline pain scores subtracted, femoral block resulted in less pain at rest compared with control (NRS difference from baseline 2.1 +/- 0.4 sem vs 3.4 +/- 0.4, respectively; P = 0.02) and less pain with movement (NRS difference 2.6 +/- 0.6, 4.3 +/- 0.6, P = 0.05) at recovery room discharge. Neither block had a significant effect on opioid use, functional outcome, or side effects. Only one (5%) patient with femoral block developed obturator motor block.

CONCLUSION

Femoral nerve blocks rarely block the obturator nerve. Single-injection femoral nerve block improved multimodal analgesia after spinal anesthesia for TKA, but this effect did not persist beyond the day of surgery. Obturator nerve block alone was of no benefit.

摘要

背景

股神经阻滞和闭孔神经阻滞均被认为有助于缓解全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的疼痛。我们旨在比较它们的疗效。

方法

60例在脊髓麻醉下接受择期单侧TKA的患者在手术结束时以随机、双盲方式接受股神经、闭孔神经或假神经阻滞。使用神经刺激法进行阻滞,并使用含5μg/mL肾上腺素的20mL 0.5%布比卡因。患者返回恢复室后开始使用芬太尼患者自控静脉镇痛、口服塞来昔布100mg每日两次以及每6小时口服对乙酰氨基酚650mg。记录48小时内静息和活动时的疼痛(0 - 10数字评分量表,NRS)、镇痛药物使用情况及副作用。记录最大膝关节屈曲度和住院总天数作为功能结局。

结果

闭孔神经阻滞组和对照组在任何结局变量上均无显著差异。减去基线疼痛评分后,股神经阻滞组静息时疼痛程度低于对照组(与基线的NRS差值分别为2.1±0.4和3.4±0.4;P = 0.02),在恢复室出院时活动时疼痛也较轻(NRS差值为2.6±0.6、4.3±0.6,P = 0.05)。两种阻滞对阿片类药物使用、功能结局或副作用均无显著影响。仅1例(5%)接受股神经阻滞的患者出现闭孔运动阻滞。

结论

股神经阻滞很少阻滞闭孔神经。单次注射股神经阻滞可改善TKA脊髓麻醉后的多模式镇痛,但这种效果在手术当日之后未持续。单独的闭孔神经阻滞无益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验