Suppr超能文献

铜绿假单胞菌和表皮葡萄球菌对硅水凝胶隐形眼镜的黏附作用。

Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to silicone-hydrogel contact lenses.

作者信息

Henriques Mariana, Sousa Cláudia, Lira Madalena, Elisabete M, Oliveira Real, Oliveira Rosário, Azeredo Joana

机构信息

Centro de Engenharia Biológica, Universidade do Minho, Portugal.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;82(6):446-50. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000168585.53845.64.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the adhesion capabilities of the most important etiologic agents of microbial ocular infection to the recently available silicone-hydrogel lenses with those to a conventional hydrogel lens.

METHODS

In vitro static adhesion assays of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 10,145, Staphylococcus epidermidis 9142 (biofilm-positive), and 12,228 (biofilm-negative) to two extended-wear silicone-hydrogel lenses (balafilcon A and lotrafilcon A), a daily wear silicone-hydrogel lens (galyfilcon A) and a conventional hydrogel (etafilcon A) were performed. To interpret the adhesion results, lens surface relative hydrophobicity was assessed by water contact angle measurements.

RESULTS

P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis 9142 exhibited greater adhesion capabilities to the extended wear silicone-hydrogel lenses than to the daily wear silicone- and conventional hydrogel lenses (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were found between the adhesion extent of these strains to galyfilcon A and etafilcon A. The biofilm negative strain of S. epidermidis adhered in larger extents to the silicone-hydrogel lenses than to the conventional hydrogel (p < 0.05), but in much lower amounts than the biofilm-positive strain. The water contact angle measurements revealed that the extended wear silicone-hydrogel lenses are hydrophobic, whereas the daily wear silicone- and conventional hydrogel lenses are hydrophilic.

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of their hydrophobicity, the extended wear silicone-hydrogel lenses (lotrafilcon A and balafilcon A) may carry higher risk of microbial contamination than both the hydrophilic daily wear silicone-hydrogel lens, galyfilcon A and the conventional hydrogel lens, etafilcon A.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较微生物性眼部感染最重要的病原体对最近上市的硅水凝胶镜片和传统水凝胶镜片的黏附能力。

方法

对铜绿假单胞菌10145、表皮葡萄球菌9142(生物膜阳性)和12228(生物膜阴性)进行体外静态黏附试验,受试镜片包括两种长戴型硅水凝胶镜片(百超菲康A和 lotrafilcon A)、一种日戴型硅水凝胶镜片(加丽菲康A)和一种传统水凝胶镜片(依他菲康A)。为解释黏附结果,通过测量水接触角评估镜片表面相对疏水性。

结果

铜绿假单胞菌和表皮葡萄球菌9142对长戴型硅水凝胶镜片的黏附能力高于对日戴型硅水凝胶镜片和传统水凝胶镜片的黏附能力(p < 0.05)。这些菌株对加丽菲康A和依他菲康A的黏附程度无统计学差异。表皮葡萄球菌的生物膜阴性菌株对硅水凝胶镜片的黏附程度高于对传统水凝胶镜片的黏附程度(p < 0.05),但黏附量远低于生物膜阳性菌株。水接触角测量结果显示,长戴型硅水凝胶镜片具有疏水性,而日戴型硅水凝胶镜片和传统水凝胶镜片具有亲水性。

结论

由于具有疏水性,长戴型硅水凝胶镜片(lotrafilcon A和百超菲康A)可能比亲水性日戴型硅水凝胶镜片加丽菲康A和传统水凝胶镜片依他菲康A携带更高的微生物污染风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验