Portwood Sharon G, Ayers Penny M, Kinnison Kelly E, Waris Robert G, Wise Daniel L
Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
J Prim Prev. 2005 Mar;26(2):129-88. doi: 10.1007/s10935-005-1975-3.
This evaluation explores the effectiveness of school-based mentoring as a universal prevention strategy. The impact of mentoring on students displaying risk factors is also addressed. The evaluation of YouthFriends, a school-based mentoring program, employed a pretest-posttest control group design. Students (n = 170) across five school districts provided data on eight dependent variables. At posttest, there was a statistically significant difference favoring YouthFriends over controls on sense of school membership. In addition, for students who had low scores at baseline, results indicated a statistically significant improvement unique to YouthFriends on community connectedness and goal-setting. Analyses of students' academic performance also indicated a positive effect for those YouthFriends who had low grades at baseline. Editors' Strategic Implications: Important lessons are provided for school administrators and mentoring program staff and evaluators. As a universal prevention program, school-based mentoring may produce few (and small) short-term effects. A greater understanding of the effects of dosage and quality of the mentoring is needed as we seek to evaluate the efficacy of school-based mentoring across a variety of student risk levels.
本评估探讨了以学校为基础的辅导作为一种普遍预防策略的有效性。同时也讨论了辅导对表现出风险因素的学生的影响。对一个以学校为基础的辅导项目“青年之友”的评估采用了前测-后测控制组设计。来自五个学区的170名学生提供了关于八个因变量的数据。在后测中,在学校归属感方面,“青年之友”组相对于对照组有统计学上的显著差异,更具优势。此外,对于基线得分较低的学生,结果表明“青年之友”在社区联系和目标设定方面有统计学上的显著改善,且这种改善是该项目独有的。对学生学业成绩的分析也表明,对于那些基线成绩较低的参与“青年之友”项目的学生有积极影响。编辑的战略启示:为学校管理人员、辅导项目工作人员和评估人员提供了重要经验教训。作为一项普遍预防项目,以学校为基础的辅导可能产生较少(且较小)的短期效果。在我们试图评估针对不同学生风险水平的以学校为基础的辅导效果时,需要更深入地了解辅导的剂量和质量所产生的影响。