Ruiz-Salmerón Rafael J, Mora Ramón, Masotti Mónica, Betriu Amadeo
Department of Interventional Cardiology, Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Oct;66(2):192-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20434.
The objective of this study was to evaluate phentolamine as radial artery spasmolytic in transradial catheterization procedures. Radial artery spasm is a relatively frequent complication during transradial approach, causing patient discomfort or even making it impossible to continue the procedure. As radial artery spasm is mediated by the stimulation of alpha-adrenoreceptors, the use of the alpha-blocker phentolamine could make sense as spasmolytic. We designed a randomized double-blind study to compare phentolamine vs. verapamil, the standard spasmolytic agent. Five hundred patients (250 in each arm) submitted to a transradial cardiac catheterization were consecutively included and randomly assigned to receive 2.5 mg of verapamil or 2.5 mg of phentolamine after sheath insertion. Both vasodilator agents induced a significant radial artery diameter increase (from 2.22 +/- 0.53 to 2.48 +/- 0.57 mm, P < 0.001 for verapamil, and from 2.20 +/- 0.53 to 2.45 +/- 0.53 mm, P < 0.001 for phentolamine). However, verapamil was more efficacious to prevent radial artery spasm (13.2% compared with 23.2% in phentolamine-treated patients; P = 0.004). Follow-up (20 +/- 18 days) evaluation of the radial artery patency by plestismography and pulse oximetry showed no differences between the two groups in the rate of radial occlusion (3.0% vs. 3.2% in verapamil and phentolamine treated patients, respectively). Phentolamine was an effective radial vasodilator agent, although it showed less ability to prevent radial artery spasm than verapamil. Radial artery occlusion rate was almost identical for both vasodilators. Thus, phentolamine could be a valid alternative to verapamil as a radial artery spasmolytic agent.
本研究的目的是评估酚妥拉明在经桡动脉导管插入术作为桡动脉解痉剂的效果。桡动脉痉挛是经桡动脉途径中相对常见的并发症,会导致患者不适,甚至使手术无法继续进行。由于桡动脉痉挛是由α-肾上腺素能受体的刺激介导的,使用α受体阻滞剂酚妥拉明作为解痉剂可能是合理的。我们设计了一项随机双盲研究,以比较酚妥拉明与标准解痉剂维拉帕米。连续纳入500例接受经桡动脉心脏导管插入术的患者(每组250例),并在鞘管插入后随机分配接受2.5mg维拉帕米或2.5mg酚妥拉明。两种血管扩张剂均使桡动脉直径显著增加(维拉帕米组从2.22±0.53mm增加到2.48±0.57mm,P<0.001;酚妥拉明组从2.20±0.53mm增加到2.45±0.53mm,P<0.001)。然而,维拉帕米在预防桡动脉痉挛方面更有效(13.2%,而酚妥拉明治疗的患者为23.2%;P=0.004)。通过体积描记法和脉搏血氧饱和度对桡动脉通畅情况进行的随访(20±18天)评估显示,两组在桡动脉闭塞率方面无差异(维拉帕米和酚妥拉明治疗的患者分别为3.0%和3.2%)。酚妥拉明是一种有效的桡动脉血管扩张剂,尽管它预防桡动脉痉挛的能力比维拉帕米弱。两种血管扩张剂的桡动脉闭塞率几乎相同。因此,酚妥拉明可作为维拉帕米的有效替代品,作为桡动脉解痉剂。