Air Force women's access to abortion services and the erosion of 10 U.S.C., section 1093.
作者信息
Wilde Marshall L
机构信息
United States Air Force Reserve, 433 AW/JA, Lackland AFB, Texas, USA.
出版信息
William Mary J Women Law. 2003 Spring;9(3):351-412.
PMID:15977327
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Air Force women's access to abortion services and the erosion of 10 U.S.C., section 1093.
William Mary J Women Law. 2003 Spring;9(3):351-412.
2
New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
John Marshall Law Rev. 1990 Summer;23(4):753-70.
3
Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
West State Univ Law Rev. 1992 Spring;19(2):393-429.
4
Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral.
Harv Law Rev. 1988 Jun;101:1895-915.
5
Review of abortion policy: legality, medicaid funding, and parental involvement, 1967-1994.
Womens Rights Law Report. 1995 Winter;17(1):1-61.
6
7
Abortion rights after South Dakota.
Free Inq. 2006 Jun-Jul;26(4):34-8.
8
Access to abortion.
CMAJ. 2007 Feb 13;176(4):492; author reply 494. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1060175.
9
Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice.
Boston Univ Law Rev. 1994 Mar;74(2):201-66.
10
Abortion and the law in 1980.
NY Law Sch Law Rev. 1980;25(3):497-525.
Zotero 插件