• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输尿管支架置入对结石大小有影响吗?对1361例体外冲击波碎石患者的回顾性分析。

Does ureteral stenting matter for stone size? A retrospectıve analyses of 1361 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients.

作者信息

Ozkan Burak, Dogan Cagatay, Can Gulce Ecem, Tansu Nejat, Erozencı Ahmet, Onal Bulent

机构信息

Acıbadem Unıversıty, Faculty of Medıcıne, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey.

Unıversıty of Istanbul, Cerrahpasa School of Medıcıne, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(3):358-64. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.611. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

DOI:10.5173/ceju.2015.611
PMID:26568882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4643708/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy of ureteral stents for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment of pelvis renalis stones and to compare the results and complications in stented and non-stented patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1995 and 2011, 1361 patients with pelvis renalis stones were treated with SWL. Patients were subdivided into three groups according to stone burden: ≤1 cm(2) (group 1; n = 514), 1.1 to 2 cm(2) (group 2; n = 530) and >2 cm(2) (group 3; n = 317). Each group was divided into subgroups of patients who did and did not undergo ureteral stent implantation before SWL treatment. The efficacy of treatment was evaluated by determining the effectiveness quotient (EQ). Statistical analysis was performed by chi-square, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

Of the 514, 530 and 317 patients in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively, 30 (6%), 44 (8%) and 104 (33%) patients underwent auxiliary stent implantation. Steinstrasse rates did not differ significantly between stented and non-stented patients in each group. The EQ was calculated as 62%, 33% and 70% respectively in non-stented, stented and totally for group 1. This ratio calculated as 58%, 25% and 63% for group 2 and 62%, 26% and 47% for group 3. Stone-free rates were significantly higher for non-stented than for stented patients in groups 2 and 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Stone free rates are significantly higher in non-stented than in stented patients with pelvis renalis stones >1 cm(2), whereas steinstrasse rates are not affected.

摘要

引言

我们研究的目的是确定输尿管支架在体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗肾盂结石中的疗效,并比较置入支架和未置入支架患者的治疗结果及并发症。

材料与方法

1995年至2011年间,1361例肾盂结石患者接受了SWL治疗。根据结石负荷将患者分为三组:≤1 cm²(第1组;n = 514)、1.1至2 cm²(第2组;n = 530)和>2 cm²(第3组;n = 317)。每组又分为SWL治疗前接受和未接受输尿管支架植入的亚组。通过确定有效率(EQ)评估治疗效果。采用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计学分析。

结果

第1、2和3组分别有514、530和317例患者,其中30例(6%)、44例(8%)和104例(33%)患者接受了辅助支架植入。每组中置入支架和未置入支架患者的石街发生率差异无统计学意义。第1组未置入支架、置入支架和总体的EQ分别计算为62%、33%和70%。第2组该比例分别为58%、25%和63%,第3组为62%、26%和47%。第2组和第3组中,未置入支架患者的无石率显著高于置入支架患者。

结论

肾盂结石>1 cm²的患者中,未置入支架患者的无石率显著高于置入支架患者,而石街发生率不受影响。

相似文献

1
Does ureteral stenting matter for stone size? A retrospectıve analyses of 1361 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients.输尿管支架置入对结石大小有影响吗?对1361例体外冲击波碎石患者的回顾性分析。
Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(3):358-64. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.611. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
2
Effect of JJ stent on outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment of moderate sized renal pelvic stones: A randomized prospective study.双J管对中等大小肾盂结石体外冲击波碎石治疗效果的影响:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Oct;43(8):425-430. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
3
Do JJ Stents Increase the Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Pediatric Renal Stones?双J支架是否能提高体外冲击波碎石术治疗小儿肾结石的疗效?
Urol Int. 2017;98(4):425-428. doi: 10.1159/000452451. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and non-stented techniques.体外冲击波碎石术治疗嵌顿性上段输尿管结石:支架与非支架技术的前瞻性随机比较。
Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.071. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
5
Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石中输尿管支架的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.073.
6
Stenting in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; may enhance the passage of the fragments!体外冲击波碎石术中的支架置入;可能会促进结石碎片的排出!
J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Mar;59(3):141-3.
7
Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与钬激光联合半硬性输尿管肾镜治疗近端输尿管大结石的比较。
J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000142848.43880.b3.
8
Novel electromagnetic lithotriptor for upper tract stones with and without a ureteral stent.用于有或无输尿管支架的上尿路结石的新型电磁碎石机。
J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1424-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.045. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
9
Has the pelvic renal stone position inside the upper loop of JJ stent any influence on the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy results?JJ支架上半环内的盆腔肾结石位置对体外冲击波碎石术的结果有影响吗?
Springerplus. 2016 Aug 8;5(1):1284. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2954-2. eCollection 2016.
10
The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.肾盂肾盏解剖结构对小儿下极结石冲击波碎石术后结石清除的影响。
J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):1082-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000135670.83076.5c.

引用本文的文献

1
Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?我们能否预测冲击波碎石术后“石街”形成时干预治疗的必要性?
Urol Ann. 2017 Jan-Mar;9(1):51-54. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.198870.
2
Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones.输尿管支架置入可预测输尿管结石患者接受体外冲击波碎石术的治疗效果。
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Nov;57(6):408-416. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
3
Impact of ureteric stent on outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A propensity score analysis.输尿管支架对体外冲击波碎石术结局的影响:一项倾向评分分析。
Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(2):184-9. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2016.680. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis.超声与 CT 检查用于疑似肾结石。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 18;371(12):1100-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404446.
2
Double J stent reduces the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lumbar ureteral stones.双J管降低体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效。
Cent European J Urol. 2013;66(3):309-13. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2013.03.art14. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
3
Stenting or not prior to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? Results of a prospective randomized study.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石前是否进行支架置入?一项前瞻性随机研究的结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):731-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-0062-3. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and non-stented techniques.体外冲击波碎石术治疗嵌顿性上段输尿管结石:支架与非支架技术的前瞻性随机比较。
Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.071. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
5
The outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal pelvic stone with and without JJ stent--a comparative study.有或无双J支架的体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾盂结石的疗效——一项对比研究
J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Mar;59(3):143-6.
6
Stenting in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; may enhance the passage of the fragments!体外冲击波碎石术中的支架置入;可能会促进结石碎片的排出!
J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Mar;59(3):141-3.
7
Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study.体外冲击波碎石术前使用双J支架并无益处:一项前瞻性随机研究的结果
Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(1):19-22. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9030-8. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
8
Prognostic factors of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of renal stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗肾结石成功的预后因素。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2006;38(1):63-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-005-3155-z.
9
[Utility of ureteral stent for stone street after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].[输尿管支架在体外冲击波碎石术后结石长街中的应用]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2005 May;51(5):309-14; dicussion 314.
10
Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones--a multivariate analysis model.肾结石体外冲击波碎石术后成功率的预测——一种多变量分析模型
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004;38(2):161-7. doi: 10.1080/00365590310022626.