Hu Xiao-yu, Wen Bei, Zhang Shuzhen, Shan Xiao-quan
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2005 Sep;62(1):26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.02.012.
Bioavailability of phthalate congeners, dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate, di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), and dioctyl phthalate, to earthworms (Eisenia fetida) were studied when earthworms were exposed to two artificially contaminated agricultural and forest soils. Only DBP and DEHP were detected in earthworms. The uptake kinetics of DBP and DEHP in earthworms was fast within the initial 10 days followed by a nearly steady state for the subsequent 20 days. An equilibrium partitioning model could be used to describe the uptake kinetics of DBP and DEHP by earthworm in two types of soils (r = 0.709-0.864). The average biota-to-soil accumulation factors (BSAFs) of DBP and DEHP at 5 mg kg(-1) in soil were 0.27 +/- 0.07 and 0.17 +/- 0.03, respectively, in agricultural soil, while the BSAFs were 0.21 +/- 0.06 and 0.07 +/- 0.02, respectively, in forest soil. The concentrations of phthalates in earthworms increased with increasing concentrations of phthalates in soil. There was a significant correlation between logC(soil) and logC(worm), with r = 0.999-0.993, demonstrating a single linear partitioning of phthalates between soil and earthworms. The bioavailability of DBP and DEHP was assessed by Soxhlet, methanol, and methanol-water (1:1) extraction methods. Our results indicated that the extractable amounts of freshly added DBP and DEHP in soils by these extraction methods were significantly correlated with those in earthworms. It was observed that the extractable DBP and DEHP by the methanol and methanol-water (1:1) extraction methods decreased with their increasing residence time in soil. In contrast, the amount extracted by the Soxhlet extraction method did not show a similar decline. Therefore, Soxhlet extraction was a poor indicator of the bioavailability of DBP and DEHP to earthworms in soil, which could lead to overestimation of the risk of soil-associated DBP and DEHP. The extractable DBP and DEHP by methanol and methanol-water (1:1) significantly decreased over 440 days. Compared with the methanol-water (1:1) extraction method, the methanol extraction method was preferred for its ability to predict the bioavailability of DBP and DEHP in aged soils.
当蚯蚓暴露于两种人工污染的农业土壤和森林土壤中时,研究了邻苯二甲酸酯同系物、邻苯二甲酸二甲酯、邻苯二甲酸二乙酯、邻苯二甲酸二正丁酯(DBP)、邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)和邻苯二甲酸二辛酯对蚯蚓(赤子爱胜蚓)的生物有效性。在蚯蚓体内仅检测到DBP和DEHP。蚯蚓体内DBP和DEHP的吸收动力学在最初10天内较快,随后20天接近稳定状态。平衡分配模型可用于描述蚯蚓在两种土壤中对DBP和DEHP的吸收动力学(r = 0.709 - 0.864)。在农业土壤中,土壤中5 mg kg(-1)的DBP和DEHP的平均生物群-土壤积累因子(BSAFs)分别为0.27±0.07和0.17±0.03,而在森林土壤中,BSAFs分别为0.21±0.06和0.07±0.02。蚯蚓体内邻苯二甲酸酯的浓度随土壤中邻苯二甲酸酯浓度的增加而增加。logC(土壤)与logC(蚯蚓)之间存在显著相关性,r = 0.999 - 0.993,表明邻苯二甲酸酯在土壤和蚯蚓之间存在单一的线性分配。通过索氏提取法、甲醇提取法和甲醇-水(1:1)提取法评估了DBP和DEHP的生物有效性。我们的结果表明,这些提取方法在土壤中新添加的DBP和DEHP的可提取量与蚯蚓体内的可提取量显著相关。观察到甲醇和甲醇-水(1:1)提取法提取出的DBP和DEHP随其在土壤中停留时间的增加而减少。相比之下,索氏提取法提取的量没有呈现类似下降趋势。因此,索氏提取法不能很好地指示土壤中DBP和DEHP对蚯蚓的生物有效性,这可能导致高估与土壤相关的DBP和DEHP的风险。甲醇和甲醇-水(1:1)提取出的DBP和DEHP在440天内显著减少。与甲醇-水(1:1)提取法相比,甲醇提取法因其能够预测老化土壤中DBP和DEHP的生物有效性而更受青睐。