Sangiolo Dario, Storer Barry, Nash Richard, Corey Lawrence, Davis Chris, Flowers Mary, Hackman Robert C, Boeckh Michael
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024, USA.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005 Jul;11(7):521-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.04.011.
The toxicity and efficacy of dapsone given daily as Pneumocystis jiroveci (PCP) prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients who cannot take trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) have not been fully evaluated. We compared 155 HSCT recipients who received daily dapsone as second-line PCP prophylaxis with 310 matched control patients who received TMP-SMX throughout the posttransplantation course. Among patients who started dapsone before transplantation because of TMP-SMX allergy, there was no difference in the transfusion requirement after HSCT when compared with controls. Among patients who started dapsone after transplantation, increased red blood cell ( P<.0001) and platelet transfusion ( P=.003) requirements were noted compared with controls. This effect was, however, limited to patients who were receiving dapsone for reasons (mostly neutropenia) other than TMP-SMX allergy. Two of 155 patients developed PCP, compared with 0 of 310 controls ( P=.11); both patients survived. In conclusion, the efficacy of daily dapsone in preventing PCP was similar to that observed in patients able to remain on TMP-SMX prophylaxis. Dapsone did not seem to cause hematologic toxicity among TMP-SMX--allergic patients. The observed higher transfusion need in patients who received dapsone for reasons other than TMP-SMX allergy seems mostly due to an underlying condition of poor marrow reserve. Further studies are required to establish whether the drug has an etiologic role in these situations.
对于无法服用甲氧苄啶 - 磺胺甲恶唑(TMP - SMX)的造血干细胞移植(HSCT)受者,每日服用氨苯砜作为耶氏肺孢子菌(PCP)预防用药的毒性和疗效尚未得到充分评估。我们将155例接受每日氨苯砜作为二线PCP预防用药的HSCT受者与310例在移植后整个过程中接受TMP - SMX的匹配对照患者进行了比较。在因TMP - SMX过敏而在移植前开始服用氨苯砜的患者中,与对照组相比,HSCT后的输血需求没有差异。在移植后开始服用氨苯砜的患者中,与对照组相比,红细胞(P <.0001)和血小板输血需求(P =.003)增加。然而,这种影响仅限于因TMP - SMX过敏以外的原因(主要是中性粒细胞减少)而接受氨苯砜治疗的患者。155例患者中有2例发生PCP,而310例对照组中无1例发生(P =.11);两名患者均存活。总之,每日氨苯砜预防PCP的疗效与能够继续接受TMP - SMX预防的患者中观察到的疗效相似。氨苯砜似乎不会在TMP - SMX过敏患者中引起血液学毒性。在因TMP - SMX过敏以外的原因接受氨苯砜治疗的患者中观察到的较高输血需求似乎主要是由于骨髓储备不良的潜在状况。需要进一步研究以确定该药物在这些情况下是否具有病因学作用。