Hing Esther, Schappert Susan M, Burt Catharine W, Shimizu Iris M
Division of Health Care Statistics, US. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, USA.
Vital Health Stat 2. 2005 Jun(139):1-32.
This report describes effects due to form length and/or item formats on respondent cooperation and survey estimates.
Two formats were used for the Patient Record form for the 2001 NAMCS and OPD component of the NHAMCS: a short form with 70 subitems and a long form with 140 subitems. The short form also contained many write-in items and fit on a one-sided page. The long form contained more check boxes and other unique items and required a two-sided page. The NAMCS sample of physicians and NHAMCS sample of hospitals were randomly divided into two half samples and randomly assigned to either the short or long form. Unit and item nonresponse rates, as well as survey estimates from the two forms, were compared using SUDAAN software, which takes into account the complex sample design of the surveys.
Physician unit response was lower for the long form overall and in certain geographic regions. Overall OPD unit response was not affected by form length, although there were some differences in favor of the long form for some types of hospitals. Despite having twice the number of check boxes on the long form as the short form, there was no difference in the percentage of visits with any diagnostic or screening services ordered or provided. However, visit estimates were usually higher for services collected with long form check-boxes than with (recoded) short form write-in entries. Finally, the study confirmed the feasibility of collecting certain items found only on the long form.
Overall, physician cooperation was more sensitive to form length than was OPD cooperation. The quality of the data was not affected by form length. Visit estimates were influenced by both content and item format.
本报告描述了表格长度和/或项目格式对受访者合作度及调查估计值的影响。
2001年国家门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)和全国医院门诊医疗调查(NHAMCS)的患者记录表采用了两种格式:一种是包含70个子项目的短表,另一种是包含140个子项目的长表。短表还包含许多填写项,且能单面打印。长表包含更多的复选框和其他独特项目,需要双面打印。NAMCS的医生样本和NHAMCS的医院样本被随机分为两个半样本,并随机分配到短表或长表。使用考虑到调查复杂样本设计的SUDAAN软件,比较了单位和项目无应答率以及两种表格的调查估计值。
总体而言,长表的医生单位应答率较低,在某些地理区域也是如此。总体上,门诊科室单位应答率不受表格长度影响,尽管在某些类型医院中,长表有一些优势。尽管长表上的复选框数量是短表的两倍,但在开具或提供任何诊断或筛查服务的就诊百分比方面没有差异。然而,对于通过长表复选框收集的服务,就诊估计值通常高于(重新编码后的)短表填写项。最后,该研究证实了收集仅在长表上出现某些项目的可行性。
总体而言,医生合作度比门诊科室合作度对表格长度更敏感。数据质量不受表格长度影响。就诊估计值受内容和项目格式两者影响。