Suppr超能文献

优化国家基于牙科实践的研究网络中应答率的调查方法。

Survey Methods to Optimize Response Rate in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

作者信息

Funkhouser Ellen, Vellala Kavya, Baltuck Camille, Cacciato Rita, Durand Emily, McEdward Deborah, Sowell Ellen, Theisen Sarah E, Gilbert Gregg H

机构信息

1 University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

2 Westat, Rockville, MD, USA.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2017 Sep;40(3):332-358. doi: 10.1177/0163278715625738. Epub 2016 Jan 10.

Abstract

Surveys of health professionals typically have low response rates, and these rates have been decreasing in the recent years. We report on the methods used in a successful survey of dentist members of the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. The objectives were to quantify the (1) increase in response rate associated with successive survey methods, (2) time to completion with each successive step, (3) contribution from the final method and personal contact, and (4) differences in response rate and mode of response by practice/practitioner characteristics. Dentist members of the network were mailed an invitation describing the study. Subsequently, up to six recruitment steps were followed: initial e-mail, two e-mail reminders at 2-week intervals, a third e-mail reminder with postal mailing a paper questionnaire, a second postal mailing of paper questionnaire, and staff follow-up. Of the 1,876 invited, 160 were deemed ineligible and 1,488 (87% of 1,716 eligible) completed the survey. Completion by step: initial e-mail, 35%; second e-mail, 15%; third e-mail, 7%; fourth e-mail/first paper, 11%; second paper, 15%; and staff follow-up, 16%. Overall, 76% completed the survey online and 24% on paper. Completion rates increased in absolute numbers and proportionally with later methods of recruitment. Participation rates varied little by practice/practitioner characteristics. Completion on paper was more likely by older dentists. Multiple methods of recruitment resulted in a high participation rate: Each step and method produced incremental increases with the final step producing the largest increase.

摘要

对医疗专业人员的调查通常回复率较低,且近年来这些回复率一直在下降。我们报告了一项针对国家基于牙科实践的研究网络中的牙医成员进行的成功调查所采用的方法。目标是量化:(1)与连续调查方法相关的回复率增加情况;(2)每个连续步骤的完成时间;(3)最终方法和个人联系的贡献;(4)根据实践/从业者特征的回复率和回复方式差异。向该网络的牙医成员邮寄了一份描述该研究的邀请函。随后,采取了多达六个招募步骤:初始电子邮件、每隔两周发送两次电子邮件提醒、第三次电子邮件提醒并邮寄纸质问卷、第二次邮寄纸质问卷以及工作人员跟进。在1876名受邀者中,160人被认为不符合条件,1488人(占1716名符合条件者的87%)完成了调查。按步骤完成情况:初始电子邮件,35%;第二次电子邮件,15%;第三次电子邮件,7%;第四次电子邮件/第一次纸质问卷,11%;第二次纸质问卷,15%;工作人员跟进,16%。总体而言,76%的人在线完成了调查,24%的人通过纸质问卷完成。完成率在绝对数量上以及与后期招募方法的比例上都有所增加。参与率因实践/从业者特征而异不大。年长的牙医更有可能通过纸质问卷完成。多种招募方法导致了高参与率:每个步骤和方法都有增量增加,最后一步增加幅度最大。

相似文献

1
Survey Methods to Optimize Response Rate in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
Eval Health Prof. 2017 Sep;40(3):332-358. doi: 10.1177/0163278715625738. Epub 2016 Jan 10.
2
Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
Pediatrics. 2003 Apr;111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.4.e299.
4
A method for achieving high response rates in national surveys of U.S. primary care physicians.
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0202755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202755. eCollection 2018.
6
Participation Rates in 11 National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Surveys 2014-2022.
Eval Health Prof. 2025 Jun;48(2):242-255. doi: 10.1177/01632787241259186. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
7
Randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists.
J Public Health Dent. 2022 Sep;82(4):484-490. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12510. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
8
A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 19;20(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01014-x.

引用本文的文献

2
Participation Rates in 11 National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Surveys 2014-2022.
Eval Health Prof. 2025 Jun;48(2):242-255. doi: 10.1177/01632787241259186. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
3
Acceptance of voice assistant technology in dental practice: A cross sectional study with dentists and validation using structural equation modeling.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 May 14;3(5):e0000510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000510. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Affected Orthodontists' Interest in Various Orthodontic Appliances?
Turk J Orthod. 2023 Dec 29;36(4):216-223. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.124.
9
Optimizing Survey Response Rates in Graduate Medical Education Research Studies.
Fam Med. 2023 May;55(5):304-310. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2023.750371. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Managing an online survey about influenza vaccination in primary healthcare workers.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jan 9;12(1):541-53. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120100541.
4
Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response.
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):382-407. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496425.
5
Purpose, structure, and function of the United States National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
J Dent. 2013 Nov;41(11):1051-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
6
Health care provider surveys in the United States, 2000-2010: a review.
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Mar;36(1):106-26. doi: 10.1177/0163278712474001.
7
Improving the quality of surveys of physicians and medical groups: a research agenda.
Eval Health Prof. 2012 Dec;35(4):477-506. doi: 10.1177/0163278712458283. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
8
Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys.
JAMA. 2012 May 2;307(17):1805-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3532.
9
Questionnaire surveys of dentists on radiology.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 May;41(4):267-75. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/58627082.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验