Funkhouser Ellen, Vellala Kavya, Baltuck Camille, Cacciato Rita, Durand Emily, McEdward Deborah, Sowell Ellen, Theisen Sarah E, Gilbert Gregg H
1 University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
2 Westat, Rockville, MD, USA.
Eval Health Prof. 2017 Sep;40(3):332-358. doi: 10.1177/0163278715625738. Epub 2016 Jan 10.
Surveys of health professionals typically have low response rates, and these rates have been decreasing in the recent years. We report on the methods used in a successful survey of dentist members of the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. The objectives were to quantify the (1) increase in response rate associated with successive survey methods, (2) time to completion with each successive step, (3) contribution from the final method and personal contact, and (4) differences in response rate and mode of response by practice/practitioner characteristics. Dentist members of the network were mailed an invitation describing the study. Subsequently, up to six recruitment steps were followed: initial e-mail, two e-mail reminders at 2-week intervals, a third e-mail reminder with postal mailing a paper questionnaire, a second postal mailing of paper questionnaire, and staff follow-up. Of the 1,876 invited, 160 were deemed ineligible and 1,488 (87% of 1,716 eligible) completed the survey. Completion by step: initial e-mail, 35%; second e-mail, 15%; third e-mail, 7%; fourth e-mail/first paper, 11%; second paper, 15%; and staff follow-up, 16%. Overall, 76% completed the survey online and 24% on paper. Completion rates increased in absolute numbers and proportionally with later methods of recruitment. Participation rates varied little by practice/practitioner characteristics. Completion on paper was more likely by older dentists. Multiple methods of recruitment resulted in a high participation rate: Each step and method produced incremental increases with the final step producing the largest increase.
对医疗专业人员的调查通常回复率较低,且近年来这些回复率一直在下降。我们报告了一项针对国家基于牙科实践的研究网络中的牙医成员进行的成功调查所采用的方法。目标是量化:(1)与连续调查方法相关的回复率增加情况;(2)每个连续步骤的完成时间;(3)最终方法和个人联系的贡献;(4)根据实践/从业者特征的回复率和回复方式差异。向该网络的牙医成员邮寄了一份描述该研究的邀请函。随后,采取了多达六个招募步骤:初始电子邮件、每隔两周发送两次电子邮件提醒、第三次电子邮件提醒并邮寄纸质问卷、第二次邮寄纸质问卷以及工作人员跟进。在1876名受邀者中,160人被认为不符合条件,1488人(占1716名符合条件者的87%)完成了调查。按步骤完成情况:初始电子邮件,35%;第二次电子邮件,15%;第三次电子邮件,7%;第四次电子邮件/第一次纸质问卷,11%;第二次纸质问卷,15%;工作人员跟进,16%。总体而言,76%的人在线完成了调查,24%的人通过纸质问卷完成。完成率在绝对数量上以及与后期招募方法的比例上都有所增加。参与率因实践/从业者特征而异不大。年长的牙医更有可能通过纸质问卷完成。多种招募方法导致了高参与率:每个步骤和方法都有增量增加,最后一步增加幅度最大。