Suppr超能文献

家庭成本效益方程与可持续的全民儿童免疫:巴基斯坦南部的一项随机整群对照试验[ISRCTN12421731]

Household cost-benefit equations and sustainable universal childhood immunisation: a randomised cluster controlled trial in south Pakistan [ISRCTN12421731].

作者信息

Andersson Neil, Cockcroft Anne, Ansari Noor, Omer Khalid, Losos Joe, Ledogar Robert J, Tugwell Peter, Shea Beverley

机构信息

Centro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales (CIET), Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Acapulco, México.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2005 Jun 28;5:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-72.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Household decision-makers decide about service use based largely on the costs and perceived benefits of health interventions. Very often this leads to different decisions than those imagined by health planners, resulting in under-utilisation of public services like immunisation. In the case of Lasbela district in the south of Pakistan, only one in every ten children is immunised despite free immunisation offers by government health services.

METHODS/DESIGN: In 32 communities representative of Lasbela district, 3344 households participated in a baseline survey on early child health. In the 18 randomly selected intervention communities, we will stimulate discussions on the household cost-benefit equation, as measured in the baseline. The reference (control) communities will also participate in the three annual follow-up surveys, feedback of the general survey results and the usual health promotion activities relating to immunisation, but without focussed discussion on the household cost-benefit equations.

DISCUSSION

This project proposes knowledge translation as a two-way communication that can be augmented by local and international evidence. We will document cultural and contextual barriers to immunisation in the context of household cost-benefit equations. The project makes this information accessible to health managers, and reciprocally, makes information on immunisation effects and side effects available to communities. We will measure the impact of this two-way knowledge translation on immunisation uptake.

摘要

背景

家庭决策者在很大程度上根据健康干预措施的成本和感知效益来决定是否使用服务。这往往导致与卫生规划者设想的不同决策,从而造成免疫接种等公共服务利用不足。以巴基斯坦南部的拉斯贝拉地区为例,尽管政府卫生服务提供免费免疫接种,但每十名儿童中只有一名接种疫苗。

方法/设计:在代表拉斯贝拉地区的32个社区中,3344户家庭参与了一项关于幼儿健康的基线调查。在18个随机选择的干预社区中,我们将围绕基线调查中衡量的家庭成本效益等式展开讨论。对照(控制)社区也将参与三次年度随访调查、总体调查结果反馈以及与免疫接种相关的常规健康促进活动,但不专门讨论家庭成本效益等式。

讨论

本项目提出知识转化是一种可通过本地和国际证据加以强化的双向沟通方式。我们将记录在家庭成本效益等式背景下免疫接种的文化和背景障碍。该项目将使卫生管理人员能够获取这些信息,反过来,也将向社区提供有关免疫接种效果和副作用的信息。我们将衡量这种双向知识转化对免疫接种率的影响。

相似文献

2
5
Impact of supplemental immunisation activity (SIA) campaigns on health systems: findings from South Africa.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Nov 1;67(11):947-52. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-202216. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
8
Influencing factors on vaccination uptake in Pakistan.
J Pak Med Assoc. 2012 Jan;62(1):59-61.

引用本文的文献

6
The women made it work: fuzzy transitive closure of the results chain in a dengue prevention trial in Mexico.
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 30;17(Suppl 1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4301-0.
7
Interventions aimed at communities to inform and/or educate about early childhood vaccination.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 19;2014(11):CD010232. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010232.pub2.
9
Equity in HIV testing: evidence from a cross-sectional study in ten Southern African countries.
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010 Sep 13;10:23. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-10-23.
10

本文引用的文献

4
Separate spheres and indirect benefits.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2003 Feb 26;1(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-1-4.
6
Vaccination and risk communication: summary of a workshop, Arlington Virginia, USA, 5-6 October 2000.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2002 Apr;38(2):124-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00791.x.
10
Effect of patient reminder/recall interventions on immunization rates: A review.
JAMA. 2000 Oct 11;284(14):1820-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.14.1820.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验