• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高印度农村地区的免疫接种率:有激励和无激励的免疫运动的集群随机对照评估。

Improving immunisation coverage in rural India: clustered randomised controlled evaluation of immunisation campaigns with and without incentives.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 50 Memorial Drive, E52-391, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.

出版信息

BMJ. 2010 May 17;340:c2220. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2220.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.c2220
PMID:20478960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2871989/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of modest non-financial incentives on immunisation rates in children aged 1-3 and to compare it with the effect of only improving the reliability of the supply of services.

DESIGN

Clustered randomised controlled study.

SETTING

Rural Rajasthan, India.

PARTICIPANTS

1640 children aged 1-3 at end point.

INTERVENTIONS

134 villages were randomised to one of three groups: a once monthly reliable immunisation camp (intervention A; 379 children from 30 villages); a once monthly reliable immunisation camp with small incentives (raw lentils and metal plates for completed immunisation; intervention B; 382 children from 30 villages), or control (no intervention, 860 children in 74 villages). Surveys were undertaken in randomly selected households at baseline and about 18 months after the interventions started (end point).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of children aged 1-3 at the end point who were partially or fully immunised.

RESULTS

Among children aged 1-3 in the end point survey, rates of full immunisation were 39% (148/382, 95% confidence interval 30% to 47%) for intervention B villages (reliable immunisation with incentives), 18% (68/379, 11% to 23%) for intervention A villages (reliable immunisation without incentives), and 6% (50/860, 3% to 9%) for control villages. The relative risk of complete immunisation for intervention B versus control was 6.7 (4.5 to 8.8) and for intervention B versus intervention A was 2.2 (1.5 to 2.8). Children in areas neighbouring intervention B villages were also more likely to be fully immunised than those from areas neighbouring intervention A villages (1.9, 1.1 to 2.8). The average cost per immunisation was $56 (2202 rupees) in intervention A and $28 (1102 rupees, about pound16 or euro19) in intervention B.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving reliability of services improves immunisation rates, but the effect remains modest. Small incentives have large positive impacts on the uptake of immunisation services in resource poor areas and are more cost effective than purely improving supply.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRSCTN87759937.

摘要

目的

评估适度非财务激励对 1-3 岁儿童免疫率的效果,并将其与仅提高服务供应可靠性的效果进行比较。

设计

集群随机对照研究。

地点

印度拉贾斯坦邦农村。

参与者

1640 名 1-3 岁终点儿童。

干预措施

134 个村庄被随机分为三组:每月一次可靠的免疫营地(干预 A;来自 30 个村庄的 379 名儿童);每月一次可靠的免疫营地,辅以小奖励(用于完成免疫的生 lentils 和金属板;干预 B;来自 30 个村庄的 382 名儿童),或对照组(无干预,74 个村庄的 860 名儿童)。在基线和干预开始后约 18 个月(终点),在随机选择的家庭中进行调查。

主要结果测量

终点调查中 1-3 岁儿童部分或完全免疫的比例。

结果

在终点调查中,1-3 岁儿童完全免疫率为 39%(148/382,95%置信区间 30%至 47%),干预 B 组(有激励的可靠免疫)为 18%(68/379,11%至 23%),干预 A 组(无激励的可靠免疫)为 6%(50/860,3%至 9%)。与对照组相比,干预 B 组完全免疫的相对风险为 6.7(4.5 至 8.8),干预 B 组与干预 A 组相比为 2.2(1.5 至 2.8)。与来自干预 A 组所在地区的儿童相比,来自干预 B 组所在地区的儿童更有可能完全免疫(1.9,1.1 至 2.8)。

结论

提高服务可靠性可提高免疫率,但效果仍然有限。在资源匮乏地区,小奖励对疫苗接种服务的利用率有很大的积极影响,而且比单纯提高供应更具成本效益。

试验注册

IRSNCTN87759937。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/4787864/e15d88178f42/bana733006.f3_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/4787864/edc091d4db76/bana733006.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/4787864/8ace57d07c98/bana733006.f2_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/4787864/e15d88178f42/bana733006.f3_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/4787864/edc091d4db76/bana733006.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/4787864/8ace57d07c98/bana733006.f2_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/4787864/e15d88178f42/bana733006.f3_default.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving immunisation coverage in rural India: clustered randomised controlled evaluation of immunisation campaigns with and without incentives.提高印度农村地区的免疫接种率:有激励和无激励的免疫运动的集群随机对照评估。
BMJ. 2010 May 17;340:c2220. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2220.
2
Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low- and middle-income countries.改善低收入和中等收入国家儿童免疫接种覆盖率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 10;7(7):CD008145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008145.pub3.
3
Mobile phone-delivered reminders and incentives to improve childhood immunisation coverage and timeliness in Kenya (M-SIMU): a cluster randomised controlled trial.手机推送提醒和激励措施以提高肯尼亚儿童免疫覆盖率和及时性(M-SIMU):一项集群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Apr;5(4):e428-e438. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30072-4.
4
Effect and cost-effectiveness of educating mothers about childhood DPT vaccination on immunisation uptake, knowledge, and perceptions in Uttar Pradesh, India: A randomised controlled trial.母亲儿童 DPT 疫苗接种教育对印度北方邦免疫接种率、知识和认知的效果和成本效益:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 6;15(3):e1002519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002519. eCollection 2018 Mar.
5
Immunisation uptake, services required and government incentives for users of formal day care.正规日托服务使用者的免疫接种情况、所需服务及政府激励措施。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999 Aug;23(4):368-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1999.tb01277.x.
6
Determinants of childhood immunisation coverage in urban poor settlements of Delhi, India: a cross-sectional study.印度德里城市贫困住区儿童免疫接种覆盖率的决定因素:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 26;6(8):e013015. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013015.
7
Effectiveness of a smart phone app on improving immunization of children in rural Sichuan Province, China: study protocol for a paired cluster randomized controlled trial.一款智能手机应用程序对提高中国四川省农村地区儿童免疫接种率的效果:一项配对整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2014 Mar 20;14:262. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-262.
8
Household cost-benefit equations and sustainable universal childhood immunisation: a randomised cluster controlled trial in south Pakistan [ISRCTN12421731].家庭成本效益方程与可持续的全民儿童免疫:巴基斯坦南部的一项随机整群对照试验[ISRCTN12421731]
BMC Public Health. 2005 Jun 28;5:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-72.
9
Community engagement and integrated health and polio immunisation campaigns in conflict-affected areas of Pakistan: a cluster randomised controlled trial.社区参与和综合卫生与脊髓灰质炎免疫运动在巴基斯坦受冲突影响地区:一项集群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Jun;5(6):e593-e603. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30184-5.
10
Primary health care and immunisation in Iran.伊朗的初级卫生保健与免疫接种
Public Health. 1991 May;105(3):229-38. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80112-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Implementing Advanced Strategies to Improve Immunization Coverage in the Elogbele Health Area.实施先进策略以提高埃洛贝莱健康区免疫接种覆盖率的效果
Cureus. 2025 Jun 4;17(6):e85346. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85346. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Incentives in immunisation campaigns in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review mapping evidence on effectiveness and unintended consequences.低收入和中等收入国家免疫接种运动中的激励措施:一项关于有效性和意外后果证据的范围界定综述
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jun 30;10(6):e019662. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019662.
3
A multi-level approach to reduce exploding type 2 diabetes in Pakistan.

本文引用的文献

1
The Demand for, and Impact of, Learning HIV Status.学习 HIV 状况的需求和影响。
Am Econ Rev. 2008 Dec 1;98(5):1829-1863. doi: 10.1257/aer.98.5.1829.
2
Food incentives to improve completion of tuberculosis treatment: randomised controlled trial in Dili, Timor-Leste.通过食物激励措施提高结核病治疗完成率:在东帝汶帝力进行的随机对照试验
BMJ. 2009 Oct 26;339:b4248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4248.
3
Increasing the demand for childhood vaccination in developing countries: a systematic review.增加发展中国家儿童疫苗接种需求:一项系统评价
一种降低巴基斯坦暴发性2型糖尿病发病率的多层次方法。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 21;13:1514090. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1514090. eCollection 2025.
4
Low parental income level is associated with pediatric COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the San Francisco Bay area.在旧金山湾区,父母低收入水平与儿童对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度有关。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22132-5.
5
Living with technological challenges: does socioeconomic status affect people's health?面对技术挑战:社会经济地位会影响人们的健康吗?
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05662-2.
6
Preventing vaccine drop-outs: Geographic and system-level barriers to full immunization coverage among children in Uttar Pradesh, India.预防疫苗接种遗漏:印度北方邦儿童实现全面免疫覆盖的地理及系统层面障碍
Vaccine X. 2025 Jan 26;23:100613. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100613. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Assessing insecticide treated nets awareness at Njala University: case study of Njala and Towama Campuses, Sierra Leone.评估恩贾拉大学对经杀虫剂处理蚊帐的认知:以塞拉利昂恩贾拉和托瓦马校区为例
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21007-5.
8
Financial Incentives for COVID-19 Vaccination: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.新冠疫苗接种的经济激励措施:一项整群随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2458542. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.58542.
9
Scoping Review of Current Costing Literature on Interventions to Reach Zero-Dose Children in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.低收入和中等收入国家针对零剂量儿童干预措施的当前成本核算文献综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Dec 19;12(12):1431. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12121431.
10
Social Signaling and Childhood Immunization: A Field Experiment in Sierra Leone.社会信号与儿童免疫接种:在塞拉利昂进行的一项实地实验
Q J Econ. 2024 Aug 29;139(4):2083-2133. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjae025. eCollection 2024 Nov.
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009 Oct 14;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-9-S1-S5.
4
Tracking progress towards universal childhood immunisation and the impact of global initiatives: a systematic analysis of three-dose diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis immunisation coverage.追踪全球儿童免疫规划的进展及全球倡议的影响:对白喉、破伤风和百日咳三联疫苗免疫覆盖率的系统分析
Lancet. 2008 Dec 13;372(9655):2031-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61869-3.
5
Role of cash in conditional cash transfer programmes for child health, growth, and development: an analysis of Mexico's Oportunidades.现金在儿童健康、成长与发展的有条件现金转移支付计划中的作用:对墨西哥“机会均等”项目的分析
Lancet. 2008 Mar 8;371(9615):828-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60382-7.
6
Estimating the costs of achieving the WHO-UNICEF Global Immunization Vision and Strategy, 2006-2015.估算实现《2006 - 2015年世界卫生组织 - 联合国儿童基金会全球免疫远景与战略》的成本。
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Jan;86(1):27-39. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.045096.
7
Conditional cash transfers for improving uptake of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.有条件现金转移支付对改善低收入和中等收入国家卫生干预措施的接受情况:一项系统评价
JAMA. 2007 Oct 24;298(16):1900-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.16.1900.
8
Accelerated measles control in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区加速麻疹控制
Lancet. 2006 Feb 4;367(9508):394-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68133-6.
9
Monetary incentives in primary health care and effects on use and coverage of preventive health care interventions in rural Honduras: cluster randomised trial.洪都拉斯农村地区初级卫生保健中的货币激励措施及其对预防性卫生保健干预措施使用和覆盖情况的影响:整群随机试验
Lancet. 2004;364(9450):2030-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17515-6.
10
Overcoming health-systems constraints to achieve the Millennium Development Goals.克服卫生系统制约因素以实现千年发展目标。
Lancet. 2004;364(9437):900-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16987-0.