• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫切除术:演变与趋势

Hysterectomy: evolution and trends.

作者信息

Baskett Thomas F

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, 5980 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, Canada B3K 6R8.

出版信息

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Jun;19(3):295-305. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.11.007. Epub 2004 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.11.007
PMID:15985249
Abstract

Hysterectomy was mentioned in Greek manuscripts 2000 years ago, but there is no proof that it was performed. Early--usually fatal--attempts at vaginal hysterectomy are recorded from the 16th century. The origins of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy are traced from the 19th century after the pioneering work of Langenbeck and Clay. Advances in anaesthesia, blood transfusion, antibiotics and surgical technique led to hysterectomy becoming the second most common operation in women. In the first part of the 20th century subtotal abdominal hysterectomy was standard, but by the 1950s this was replaced by total abdominal hysterectomy. There has been a recent, albeit minor, resurgence of interest in subtotal hysterectomy. The development of laparoscopic assisted hysterectomy in the 1990s has, ironically, led to the re-emergence of standard vaginal hysterectomy as the method of choice for most cases of benign gynaecological disease requiring hysterectomy. At the start of the 21st century there are signs that alternatives to hysterectomy-such as hysteroscopic surgery, uterine fibroid embolization, and the levonorgestrel intrauterine device-are leading to a reduction in hysterectomy rates.

摘要

子宫切除术在2000年前的希腊手稿中就有提及,但并无证据表明当时已实施该手术。16世纪有早期(通常是致命的)经阴道子宫切除术的尝试记录。经阴道和经腹子宫切除术的起源可追溯到19世纪,此前有朗根贝克和克莱的开创性工作。麻醉、输血、抗生素及手术技术的进步使子宫切除术成为女性第二常见的手术。在20世纪上半叶,经腹次全子宫切除术是标准术式,但到20世纪50年代,这被经腹全子宫切除术所取代。最近,尽管程度较轻,但对次全子宫切除术的兴趣有所复苏。具有讽刺意味的是,20世纪90年代腹腔镜辅助子宫切除术的发展,使标准经阴道子宫切除术再次成为大多数需要子宫切除术的良性妇科疾病病例的首选方法。在21世纪初,有迹象表明子宫切除术的替代方法,如宫腔镜手术、子宫肌瘤栓塞术和左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器,正导致子宫切除率下降。

相似文献

1
Hysterectomy: evolution and trends.子宫切除术:演变与趋势
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Jun;19(3):295-305. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.11.007. Epub 2004 Dec 30.
2
[Laparoscopic hysterectomy--brief history, frequency, indications and contraindications].[腹腔镜子宫切除术——简史、频率、适应证及禁忌证]
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2012;51(4):40-4.
3
Past, present, and future of hysterectomy.子宫切除术的过去、现在和未来。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):421-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.005.
4
Hysterectomy throughout history.贯穿历史的子宫切除术。
Acta Chir Iugosl. 2011;58(4):9-14.
5
Surgical Trends and Time Frame Comparison of Surgical Types of Hysterectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based 15-year Study.手术趋势和子宫切除术手术类型的时间框架比较:一项全国范围内基于人群的 15 年研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):65-73.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
6
[Renaissance of vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma. 100th anniversary of the first abdominal radical surgery of cervical carcinoma by Ernst Wertheim on November 16, 1898].[子宫颈癌经阴道子宫切除术的复兴。1898年11月16日恩斯特·韦特海姆首次进行子宫颈癌腹部根治性手术100周年]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2000 Apr 7;112(7):299-309.
7
Subtotal hysterectomy revisited.
Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1995 Apr-Jun;3(2-3):105-8.
8
The evolution of uterine surgery.子宫手术的发展历程。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;49(4):713-21. doi: 10.1097/01.grf.0000211945.51712.99.
9
Hysterectomy: a historical perspective.
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Mar;11(1):1-22. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(97)80047-8.
10
Evolution of cesarean hysterectomy.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1969 Sep;12(3):575-89. doi: 10.1097/00003081-196909000-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Colpocleisis Still Hold Value? The Evolution of Apical Prolapse Surgery: A Comparative National Database Study.阴道封闭术是否仍有价值?顶端脱垂手术的演变:一项全国性数据库对比研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 20;14(5):1414. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051414.
2
Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Gynecologic Benign Pathology: A Systematic Review of the Literature.机器人单孔子宫切除术在妇科良性疾病中的应用:文献系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 20;59(2):411. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020411.
3
Evaluation of complications, conversion rate, malignancy rate, and, surgeon's experience in laparoscopic assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) of 1274 large uteri: A retrospective study.
评价腹腔镜辅助经宫颈子宫切除术(LASH)治疗 1274 例大子宫的并发症、中转率、恶性肿瘤发生率及术者经验:一项回顾性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Dec;101(12):1450-1457. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14468. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
Research on myoma in Northeastern Romania and socio-medical outcomes.罗马尼亚东北部子宫肌瘤研究及社会医学成果
Exp Ther Med. 2022 Jan;23(1):30. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10952. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
5
Cervical Cancer Surgery: Current State of Affairs.宫颈癌手术:现状
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021 Apr 30;10(2):75-83. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_81_20. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
6
Effects of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy on anorectal functions along with quality of life of the patient.腹式子宫切除术和阴式子宫切除术对患者肛门直肠功能及生活质量的影响。
Afr Health Sci. 2018 Sep;18(3):612-622. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v18i3.19.
7
Submucous Fibroids, Fertility, and Possible Correlation to Pseudocapsule Thickness in Reproductive Surgery.黏膜下肌瘤、生育能力与生殖手术中假包膜厚度的可能相关性。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Sep 3;2018:2804830. doi: 10.1155/2018/2804830. eCollection 2018.
8
Absent organs--present selves: exploring embodiment and gender identity in young Norwegian women's accounts of hysterectomy.缺失的器官——存在的自我:探索年轻挪威女性子宫切除术叙述中的身体体现和性别认同。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2015 Apr 30;10:26720. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v10.26720. eCollection 2015.
9
Comparison of surgical indications for hysterectomy by age and approach in 4653 Chinese women.4653名中国女性子宫切除术手术指征按年龄和手术方式的比较
Front Med. 2014 Dec;8(4):464-70. doi: 10.1007/s11684-014-0338-y. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
10
Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a historical perspective.盆腔器官脱垂的手术治疗:历史回顾。
Curr Urol Rep. 2012 Jun;13(3):256-61. doi: 10.1007/s11934-012-0249-x.