Beyers Jennifer M, Evans-Whipp Tracy, Mathers Megan, Toumbourou John W, Catalano Richard F
Social Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 3rd Avenue, NE, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.
J Sch Health. 2005 Apr;75(4):134-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.00011.x.
Using mail survey data collected from primary and secondary school administrators in Washington State, United States, and in Victoria, Australia, this study compared aspects of the school drug policy environment in the 2 states. Documented substance-use policies were prevalent in Washington and Victoria but less prevalent.in primary schools, especially in Victoria. Victorian school policy-setting processes were significantly more likely to involve teachers, parents, and students than processes in Washington schools. Consistent with expectations based on their respective national drug policy frameworks, school drug policies in Washington schools were more oriented toward total abstinence and more frequently enforced with harsh punishment (such as expulsion or calling law enforcement), whereas policies in Victorian schools were more reflective of harm-minimization principles. Within both states, however, schools more regularly used harsh punishment and remediation consequences for alcohol and illicit-drug violations compared to tobacco policy violations, which were treated more leniently.
本研究利用从美国华盛顿州以及澳大利亚维多利亚州的中小学管理人员处收集的邮件调查数据,比较了这两个州学校毒品政策环境的各个方面。已记录在案的物质使用政策在华盛顿州和维多利亚州都很普遍,但在小学中不太普遍,尤其是在维多利亚州。与华盛顿州学校的政策制定过程相比,维多利亚州学校的政策制定过程明显更有可能让教师、家长和学生参与其中。根据各自国家的毒品政策框架预期,华盛顿州学校的毒品政策更倾向于完全戒除,且更频繁地采用严厉惩罚措施(如开除或报警),而维多利亚州学校的政策则更体现减少伤害原则。然而,在这两个州内,与对烟草政策违规行为处理更为宽松相比,学校对酒精和非法药物违规行为更经常使用严厉惩罚和补救措施。