Zylinski C G, Nanda R S, Kapila S
Department of Orthodontics, University of Oklahoma College of Dentistry, Oklahoma City.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Jun;101(6):514-8. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70125-T.
Three of the integumental variables, namely, the total facial convexity, upper lip to esthetic plane, and lower lip length, showed significant measurement errors in the preadolescent boys. Large standard deviations were also found for several variables in both age groups. This suggests that a range of values, rather than means, should be used in clinical cephalometric evaluations. A table of means, standard deviations, and ranges for the variables evaluated is provided. The nasolabial and the mentolabial angles did not differ significantly between the younger and the older age groups. The total soft tissue facial convexity was noted to have a marginally significant difference between the adults and children. Other variables were significantly different between the two age groups, and indicated that the adults had a relatively straighter facial profile than the children. In addition, the upper and lower lips were more retrusive relative to the esthetic plane in adults. Sagittal proportions relating nasal depth/nose to most protrusive lip/chin to most protrusive lip were found to have a ratio of 2.1:1.0:1.2 in children and 1.8:1.0:0.3 in adults.
在青春期前男孩中,三个体表变量,即面部总凸度、上唇至审美平面的距离以及下唇长度,显示出显著的测量误差。在两个年龄组中,几个变量也发现了较大的标准差。这表明在临床头影测量评估中应使用一系列数值而非均值。提供了所评估变量的均值、标准差和范围表。鼻唇角和颏唇角在较年轻和较年长年龄组之间没有显著差异。成人和儿童之间的面部软组织总凸度存在微小显著差异。两个年龄组之间的其他变量存在显著差异,表明成人的面部轮廓比儿童相对更直。此外,相对于审美平面,成人的上唇和下唇更后缩。发现儿童中鼻深/鼻至最突唇/颏至最突唇的矢状比例为2.1:1.0:1.2,成人为1.8:1.0:0.3。